I have a question related to RFC2317 "Classless IN-ADDR.ARPA delegation."
Earlier this year, I switched from a class C bank of 256 addresses to
a reduced set of 32 ips (/27). To get PTR queries to work, RFC2317
was referred by my ISP to prepare the delegation.
Having implemented RFC2317, I
On 8/24/2017 1:31 PM, Grant Taylor wrote:
Before I release my updates, I wonder if this was the right thing to
do.
I prefer to use a different method to do classless in-addr.arpa
delegation.
Specifically, I ask ISPs to put an NS record for the IP(s) in question
pointing to my own DNS server.
On 8/24/2017 12:06 PM, Vladimír Čunát wrote:
Hello.
On 08/24/2017 05:46 PM, Hector Santos wrote:
[...] Not expecting this in my DNS resolver code, I modified the
resolver to take the CNAMEs into account and return the host names
instead. Was this the correct thing to do, thus providing the
On 8/30/2017 3:53 PM, Tony Finch wrote:
Hector Santos wrote:
Not expecting this in my DNS resolver code, I modified the resolver to take
the CNAMEs into account and return the host names instead. Was this the
correct thing to do, thus providing the same results regardless of the query
this something worth pursuing as a new I-D for DNS servers?
Thanks
--
Hector Santos, CTO
http://www.santronics.com
http://santronics.blogspot.com
___
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
Paul Vixie wrote:
On 2012-02-28 12:27 AM, Edward Lewis wrote:
At 13:35 -0500 2/27/12, Hector Santos wrote:
If it doesn't already exist or not considered in the past as an
unfeasible concept, I am interest in seeing if this is something
worth pursuing.
One (not the only, Ohta replied
of the immediate highlight was the huge amount of low TTLs. What
does disseminate or discriminate these?
--
Hector Santos, CTO
http://www.santronics.com
http://santronics.blogspot.com
Eric Osterweil wrote:
Hey list,
So far, we have not gotten a huge amount of feedback on this draft (but thank
I like the idea. A fews ago we needed to write a local cache for our
total system framework to create a single source API query for all of
our apps within the framework using DNS. The cache database was
prepared with a query frequency field (QFF) with the idea in the future
to come up with com
well, for a moment, I did have to think about this draft being a joke or
not. But the acronym was perfect. :)
On 7/3/2013 1:30 PM, Warren Kumari wrote:
On Jul 2, 2013, at 1:58 AM, Matthijs Mekking wrote:
This sounds a lot like prefetch in unbound, and the configuration option
gives some an
Is there is a plug and play 32 bit and/or 64 bit Windows version?
On 2/26/2014 1:46 PM, Wiley, Glen wrote:
Verisign and NLnet Labs are pleased to announce the first beta release (0.1.0) of an
open source implementation of the getdns API specification. The project's home page
is at http://getd
wrote:
Not yet, but that us on the hit list for us.
On Wednesday, February 26, 2014, Hector Santos wrote:
Is there is a plug and play 32 bit and/or 64 bit Windows version?
On 2/26/2014 1:46 PM, Wiley, Glen wrote:
Verisign and NLnet Labs are pleased to announce the first beta release
(0.1.0
On 7/23/2014 7:57 AM, Masataka Ohta wrote:
David Conrad wrote:
Since I mentioned it and some folks said "where is it?":
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-ohta-shared-root-server-03
In what context, did you mention it?
Masataka Ohta
> On Jul 23, 2014, at 9:46 AM, Tony Finch wrote:
>
> Hector Santos wrote:
>>
>> What has been crossing my mind regarding this NULL MX setup, was the possible
>> privacy issue with NULL MX root domain "Traceability" aspect with legacy MTAs
>>
On 7/25/2014 1:18 PM, Kevin Darcy wrote:>
I remain skeptical that the methodology in the draft, as written,
requires no code changes, since I just performed a private experiment
with a recent version of sendmail, and delivery failed in a
spectacularly ugly way that made it appear much more like
On 7/25/2014 6:41 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
In message <53d2dbec.6060...@isdg.net>, Hector Santos writes:
We will need to tweak the code or the retry frequency table for this
particular socket error, in this case 10061. To optimize, we will
need to specifically look for three cond
15 matches
Mail list logo
