>>>>> "RB" == Ray Bellis <r...@bellis.me.uk> writes:
RB> I quite like the idea of _client._<service>._<proto>, though. RB> Thinking more though, I actually prefer _<service>._<proto>._client. I suggested _<service>._client. on the dane list. Having _client on thr left would impact having a CNAME RR at _<service>._<proto>. There really is no need for _<proto>, and given that some higher-level protocols work over multiple protos, having a single TLSA is easier than having to have a bunch of CNAMEs. -JimC -- James Cloos <cl...@jhcloos.com> OpenPGP: 0x997A9F17ED7DAEA6 _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
