> On Jul 10, 2018, at 7:22 PM, Mark Nottingham <m...@mnot.net> wrote: > > > >> On 11 Jul 2018, at 3:55 am, Joe Abley <jab...@hopcount.ca> wrote: >> >> On Jul 10, 2018, at 18:02, Adam Roach <a...@nostrum.com> wrote: >> >>> In large part because DNS provides "a richer scheme that accommodates >>> address families and multiple addresses with priorities". >> >> *cups hand to ear* >> >> Was that the sound of a distant desire to specify use of SRV for HTTP? >> > > I recently did some digging on this topic, and can try to characterise what > the issues / objections are. > > Would people be interested in a (hopefully brief) side meeting to discuss and > maybe come to a shared understanding of the problem space?
Definitely. We (Traffic Server) added some support for SRV a while back, but it’s mostly a hack. Cheers, — Leif _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
