There's an thread about Firefox and ANY queries on dns-operations@ ML.
https://lists.dns-oarc.net/pipermail/dns-operations/2015-March/thread.html#12897
Best regards
--
Marcus Grando
marcus (at) sbh.eng.br
mnag (at) FreeBSD.org
@marcusgrando
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Simon Perr
6 will gone later and this will
works fine.
What you guys thinking about all comments?
Best regards
--
Marcus Grando
marcus (at) sbh.eng.br
mnag (at) FreeBSD.org
@marcusgrando
___
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
using
scope netmask to protect resolver resources, an example is: if scope
netmask was 23, authoritative only can use <=23 to scope netmask response.
I know that can be a problem with IPv4 ends, but can save resources on
resolver side.
Best regards
--
Marcus Grando
marcus (at) sbh.eng.br
@marcusg
le. So interest appears to be growing.
>
> > Its probably already more widely deployed than IPv6...
>
> On the auth side I think you're right. It's the client side that's the
> missing link. But this is a classic alignment-of-interest problem. The
> relatively s
