Re: [DNSOP] AAAA4Free

At Mon, 11 Apr 2016 15:54:05 +0200, Shane Kerr wrote: > At 2016-04-08 11:28:12 -0300 Ray Bellis wrote: > > > May I please remind the WG of draft-bellis-dnsext-multi-qtypes-01 > > I note that your idea was about 3 years ago. When it was mentioned, > Alfred Hönes noted his

Re: [DNSOP] the Chaosnet installed base

At Thu, 17 Mar 2016 08:21:06 +, Jim Reid wrote: > > Though IIRC, a handful of universities dabbled with Hesiod in the > late 80s or theresabouts and that used the Chaosnet Class. That > stuff should be long dead and buried by now. No, that was yet another class, HS. Hesiod was an MIT

Re: [DNSOP] [internet-dra...@ietf.org: New Version Notification for draft-sullivan-dns-class-useless-01.txt]

At Tue, 15 Mar 2016 21:24:53 -0400, Andrew Sullivan wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 12:20:40PM +1100, Mark Andrews wrote: > > It's more that the registry failed to scoop up all the old definitions. > > Perhaps. The documentation I could find for chaosnet is pretty thin, > and STD 13 is

Re: [DNSOP] Prefixed name spaces and DANE client TLSA

[Commenting only on technical aspect of the name structure -- discussion of whether the namespace is cluttered, pretty, intuitive, etc, are too abstract for me. Not making light of user confusion issues, just recusing on them.] I would recommend that you think about how any of these proposed

Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-perreault-dnsop-stats-mib-00.txt

At Tue, 24 Apr 2012 08:51:46 -0400, Simon Perreault wrote: We have just submitted a new draft about a DNS server stats MIB. Any feedback would be appreciated! If you haven't already read RFC 3197, please do so. It's short. ___ DNSOP mailing list

Re: [DNSOP] Rude legalese phone call, possibly related to patent infringement

hat wg-co-chair=on Ok, that's enough. Todd, you have made your point that you believe you have IPR in this space. Noted. Now everyone please stop this, immediately. This is not a forum for legal debates, let alone insults, and claims that Todd might or might not have against

Re: [DNSOP] Confirmation of Chicago decision on draft-anderson-reverse-dns-status

hat wg-co-chair=on The 19 August cut-off having passed, and having seen no support for WG adoption of draft-anderson-reverse-dns-status from anyone but the draft's author, the Chicago decision not to adopt the draft stands. /hat ___ DNSOP

Re: [DNSOP] Request for IETF69 DNSOP Agenda Items

At Fri, 6 Jul 2007 11:45:25 -0400 (EDT), Dean Anderson wrote: I would like to have the WG discuss taking up my draft (draft-anderson-reverse-dns-status) as a WG document. Thanks, --Dean hat wg-co-chair=on Per Dean's request, I asked those WG participants who were

[DNSOP] Confirmation of Chicago decision on draft-anderson-reverse-dns-status

[Resending with fixed subject line, sorry for the duplication --sra] At Fri, 6 Jul 2007 11:45:25 -0400 (EDT), Dean Anderson wrote: I would like to have the WG discuss taking up my draft (draft-anderson-reverse-dns-status) as a WG document. Thanks, --Dean hat

Re: [DNSOP] Adopt draft-koch-dnsop-resolver-priming as WG work item?

At Tue, 12 Jun 2007 20:47:57 -0400, Thierry Moreau wrote: Now that the draft-koch-dnsop-resolver-priming is adopted as as WG work item, and that an IPR disclosure has been filed [2], I would request Rob to revisit his (premature) directive regarding this work [3], and retract it. Thanks

Re: [DNSOP] Adopt draft-koch-dnsop-resolver-priming as WG work item?

hat wg-chair=on At Sat, 02 Jun 2007 18:15:04 -0700, I wrote: This is a call to confirm the decision made at the face to face WG meeting in Prague to adopt draft-koch-dnsop-resolver-priming. Discussion in Prague showed reasonably strong support and no objections, but as always,

Re: [DNSOP] Adopt draft-koch-dnsop-resolver-priming as WG work item?

to the common affiliation of Mr. Rob Austein and Mr. Paul Vixie to ISC, and the subordination relationship that can be inferred from Mr. Paul Vixie's position as ISC president. Paul has never tried to control what I do as DNSOP WG co-chair, and clearly understands the obligations that go with my position

Re: [DNSOP] Adopt draft-koch-dnsop-resolver-priming as WG work item?

At Mon, 04 Jun 2007 13:18:25 -0400, Thierry Moreau wrote: Is this a genuine invitation for open participation, or are the wg activities subject to the arbitrary censorship directive issued earlier by you (ref http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/current/msg05460.html)?