[DNSOP] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf-fix-04: (with COMMENT)

2018-10-10 Thread Spencer Dawkins
Spencer Dawkins has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf-fix-04: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please

Re: [DNSOP] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf-13: (with COMMENT)

2018-10-10 Thread Spencer Dawkins at IETF
Hi, Dave, On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 3:52 PM Dave Crocker wrote: > On 10/10/2018 4:38 PM, Paul Vixie wrote: > > i can live with that. > > > >> > >> which is one heck of a lot of "resource record types" in the same, short > >> paragraph. > > > > truth hurts. > > mumble. drat. that's two in favor, wh

[DNSOP] Spencer Dawkins' Discuss on draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf-fix-04: (with DISCUSS)

2018-10-10 Thread Spencer Dawkins
Spencer Dawkins has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf-fix-04: Discuss When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to

[DNSOP] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf-13: (with COMMENT)

2018-10-10 Thread Spencer Dawkins
Spencer Dawkins has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf-13: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer

Re: [DNSOP] Benjamin Kaduk's Yes on draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-any-07: (with COMMENT)

2018-09-10 Thread Spencer Dawkins at IETF
On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 9:48 AM Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-any-07: Yes > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut

Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Spencer Dawkins' Yes on draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis-13: (with COMMENT)

2018-08-28 Thread Spencer Dawkins at IETF
Hi, Paul, On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 2:52 PM Paul Hoffman wrote: > On Aug 27, 2018, at 8:55 PM, Spencer Dawkins < > spencerdawkins.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > > In this text, > > > > 2. Names > > > > ... > > > > The common display format is

[DNSOP] Spencer Dawkins' Yes on draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis-13: (with COMMENT)

2018-08-27 Thread Spencer Dawkins
Spencer Dawkins has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis-13: Yes When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to

[DNSOP] Spencer Dawkins' Yes on draft-ietf-dnsop-session-signal-13: (with COMMENT)

2018-08-02 Thread Spencer Dawkins
Spencer Dawkins has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dnsop-session-signal-13: Yes When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to

Re: [DNSOP] Spencer Dawkins' Discuss on draft-ietf-dnsop-session-signal-12: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2018-08-02 Thread Spencer Dawkins at IETF
Hi, Ted, Chopping down to clearing my Discuss, and one wording suggestion for new text ... On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 1:41 PM Ted Lemon wrote: > On Jul 27, 2018, at 12:33 AM, Spencer Dawkins < > spencerdawkins.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I really like this document, and think it&

Re: [DNSOP] Spencer Dawkins' Discuss on draft-ietf-dnsop-session-signal-12: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2018-07-29 Thread Spencer Dawkins at IETF
Hi, Benjamin, On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 12:33 PM Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 09:33:20PM -0700, Spencer Dawkins wrote: > > -- &g

[DNSOP] Spencer Dawkins' Discuss on draft-ietf-dnsop-session-signal-12: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2018-07-26 Thread Spencer Dawkins
Spencer Dawkins has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dnsop-session-signal-12: Discuss When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer

Re: [DNSOP] Spencer Dawkins' Yes on draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps-07: (with COMMENT)

2017-07-05 Thread Spencer Dawkins at IETF
Hi, Benoit, On Jul 5, 2017 12:32 PM, "Benoit Claise" wrote: Hi, Hi, Ted, On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 12:20 PM, Ted Lemon wrote: > Spencer, not to respond to all your comments right now, but just to point > this out: the list of problems is not claimed to be correct. It is > claimed to be the li

Re: [DNSOP] Spencer Dawkins' Yes on draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps-07: (with COMMENT)

2017-07-05 Thread Spencer Dawkins at IETF
Hi, Ted, On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 12:20 PM, Ted Lemon wrote: > Spencer, not to respond to all your comments right now, but just to point > this out: the list of problems is not claimed to be correct. It is > claimed to be the list of problems that people have asserted exist. I do > not agree t

[DNSOP] Spencer Dawkins' Yes on draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps-07: (with COMMENT)

2017-07-04 Thread Spencer Dawkins
Spencer Dawkins has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps-07: Yes When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https

[DNSOP] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec-aggressiveuse-09: (with COMMENT)

2017-05-24 Thread Spencer Dawkins
Spencer Dawkins has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec-aggressiveuse-09: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however

Re: [DNSOP] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-resolver-priming-09: (with COMMENT)

2016-12-06 Thread Spencer Dawkins at IETF
Hi, Paul, On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 8:39 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote: > [[ BTW, sorry for not changing the subject line on this thread. It really > does relate to all the IESG comments, not jus Ben's. ]] > > On 6 Dec 2016, at 18:32, Spencer Dawkins at IETF wrote: > > On 30 Nov

Re: [DNSOP] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-resolver-priming-09: (with COMMENT)

2016-12-06 Thread Spencer Dawkins at IETF
Hi, Paul, On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 1:08 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote: > Thanks for your comments and for having no objections to the document. > This message follows up on the comments. > > --Paul Hoffman > Deleted down to > On 30 Nov 2016, at 22:48, Spencer Dawkins wrote: > &g

[DNSOP] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-resolver-priming-09: (with COMMENT)

2016-11-30 Thread Spencer Dawkins
Spencer Dawkins has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dnsop-resolver-priming-09: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please

Re: [DNSOP] Spencer Dawkins' Yes on draft-ietf-dnsop-nxdomain-cut-04: (with COMMENT)

2016-09-14 Thread Spencer Dawkins at IETF
Hi, Shumon, On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 8:47 PM, Shumon Huque wrote: > On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 6:05 PM, Spencer Dawkins at IETF < > spencerdawkins.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi, Shumon, >> >> On Wed, Sep 14, 201

Re: [DNSOP] Spencer Dawkins' Yes on draft-ietf-dnsop-nxdomain-cut-04: (with COMMENT)

2016-09-14 Thread Spencer Dawkins at IETF
Hi, Shumon, On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 4:33 PM, Shumon Huque wrote: > >> -- >> COMMENT: >> -- >> >> I honestly look forward to reading DNSOPS drafts because they a

[DNSOP] Spencer Dawkins' Yes on draft-ietf-dnsop-nxdomain-cut-04: (with COMMENT)

2016-09-14 Thread Spencer Dawkins
Spencer Dawkins has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dnsop-nxdomain-cut-04: Yes When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to

[DNSOP] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-maintain-ds-03: (with COMMENT)

2016-08-29 Thread Spencer Dawkins
Spencer Dawkins has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dnsop-maintain-ds-03: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please

Re: [DNSOP] Terry Manderson's Discuss on draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-roadblock-avoidance-04: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2016-07-13 Thread Spencer Dawkins at IETF
This is Not My Yes, but ... On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 12:28 AM, Terry Manderson wrote: > Hi Wes, > > Thanks for responding. > > I'll trim to only the the remaining items needing a response, and express > my appreciation at the clarified items. > > On 9/07/2016, 9:53 AM, "iesg on behalf of Wes Hard

Re: [DNSOP] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-roadblock-avoidance-04: (with COMMENT)

2016-07-08 Thread Spencer Dawkins at IETF
Hi, Wes, On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 4:05 PM, Wes Hardaker wrote: > "Spencer Dawkins" writes: > > > Spencer Dawkins has entered the following ballot position for > > draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-roadblock-avoidance-04: No Objection > > > > When responding, pleas

[DNSOP] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-roadblock-avoidance-04: (with COMMENT)

2016-07-05 Thread Spencer Dawkins
Spencer Dawkins has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-roadblock-avoidance-04: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however

[DNSOP] Spencer Dawkins' Yes on draft-ietf-dnsop-5966bis-05: (with COMMENT)

2016-01-07 Thread Spencer Dawkins
Spencer Dawkins has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dnsop-5966bis-05: Yes When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https

Re: [DNSOP] Spencer Dawkins' Yes on draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-terminology-04: (with COMMENT)

2015-09-18 Thread Spencer Dawkins at IETF
Hi, Paul, Thanks for the followup! That works ... Spencer On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 3:59 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote: > On 18 Sep 2015, at 13:41, Spencer Dawkins at IETF wrote: > > Hi, Paul, >> >> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 2:08 PM, Paul Hoffman >> wrote: >> >> O

Re: [DNSOP] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00: (with COMMENT)

2015-09-03 Thread Spencer Dawkins at IETF
Hi, Alec, On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 6:31 AM, Alec Muffett wrote: > Hello Spencer! > > I do have one observation that I haven't seen anyone else touch on: > > I thought .onion was tied closely to the TOR protocol, so I have no idea > why the second sentence in this paragraph is here, or what it mean

Re: [DNSOP] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00: (with COMMENT)

2015-09-03 Thread Spencer Dawkins at IETF
Hi, Christian, On Sep 3, 2015 01:14, "Christian Grothoff" wrote: > > On 09/03/2015 04:54 AM, Spencer Dawkins wrote: > > I thought .onion was tied closely to the TOR protocol, so I have no idea > > why the second sentence in this paragraph is here, or what it means