Re: [DNSOP] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf-13: (with COMMENT)

Hi, Dave, On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 3:52 PM Dave Crocker wrote: > On 10/10/2018 4:38 PM, Paul Vixie wrote: > > i can live with that. > > > >> > >> which is one heck of a lot of "resource record types" in the same, short > >> paragraph. > > > > truth hurts. > > mumble. drat. that's two in favor, wh

Re: [DNSOP] Benjamin Kaduk's Yes on draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-any-07: (with COMMENT)

On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 9:48 AM Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-any-07: Yes > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut

Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Spencer Dawkins' Yes on draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis-13: (with COMMENT)

Hi, Paul, On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 2:52 PM Paul Hoffman wrote: > On Aug 27, 2018, at 8:55 PM, Spencer Dawkins < > spencerdawkins.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > > In this text, > > > > 2. Names > > > > ... > > > > The common display format is used in applications and free text. > > It is the

Re: [DNSOP] Spencer Dawkins' Discuss on draft-ietf-dnsop-session-signal-12: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Hi, Ted, Chopping down to clearing my Discuss, and one wording suggestion for new text ... On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 1:41 PM Ted Lemon wrote: > On Jul 27, 2018, at 12:33 AM, Spencer Dawkins < > spencerdawkins.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I really like this document, and think it's headed the right

Re: [DNSOP] Spencer Dawkins' Discuss on draft-ietf-dnsop-session-signal-12: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Hi, Benjamin, On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 12:33 PM Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 09:33:20PM -0700, Spencer Dawkins wrote: > > -- > > COMMENT: > >

Re: [DNSOP] Spencer Dawkins' Yes on draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps-07: (with COMMENT)

Hi, Benoit, On Jul 5, 2017 12:32 PM, "Benoit Claise" wrote: Hi, Hi, Ted, On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 12:20 PM, Ted Lemon wrote: > Spencer, not to respond to all your comments right now, but just to point > this out: the list of problems is not claimed to be correct. It is > claimed to be the li

Re: [DNSOP] Spencer Dawkins' Yes on draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps-07: (with COMMENT)

Hi, Ted, On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 12:20 PM, Ted Lemon wrote: > Spencer, not to respond to all your comments right now, but just to point > this out: the list of problems is not claimed to be correct. It is > claimed to be the list of problems that people have asserted exist. I do > not agree t

Re: [DNSOP] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-resolver-priming-09: (with COMMENT)

Hi, Paul, On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 8:39 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote: > [[ BTW, sorry for not changing the subject line on this thread. It really > does relate to all the IESG comments, not jus Ben's. ]] > > On 6 Dec 2016, at 18:32, Spencer Dawkins at IETF wrote: > > On 30 Nov

Re: [DNSOP] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-resolver-priming-09: (with COMMENT)

Hi, Paul, On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 1:08 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote: > Thanks for your comments and for having no objections to the document. > This message follows up on the comments. > > --Paul Hoffman > Deleted down to > On 30 Nov 2016, at 22:48, Spencer Dawkins wrote: > > I find myself curious a

Re: [DNSOP] Spencer Dawkins' Yes on draft-ietf-dnsop-nxdomain-cut-04: (with COMMENT)

Hi, Shumon, On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 8:47 PM, Shumon Huque wrote: > On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 6:05 PM, Spencer Dawkins at IETF < > spencerdawkins.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi, Shumon, >> >> On Wed, Sep 14, 201

Re: [DNSOP] Spencer Dawkins' Yes on draft-ietf-dnsop-nxdomain-cut-04: (with COMMENT)

Hi, Shumon, On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 4:33 PM, Shumon Huque wrote: > >> -- >> COMMENT: >> -- >> >> I honestly look forward to reading DNSOPS drafts because they a

Re: [DNSOP] Terry Manderson's Discuss on draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-roadblock-avoidance-04: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

This is Not My Yes, but ... On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 12:28 AM, Terry Manderson wrote: > Hi Wes, > > Thanks for responding. > > I'll trim to only the the remaining items needing a response, and express > my appreciation at the clarified items. > > On 9/07/2016, 9:53 AM, "iesg on behalf of Wes Hard

Re: [DNSOP] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-roadblock-avoidance-04: (with COMMENT)

Hi, Wes, On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 4:05 PM, Wes Hardaker wrote: > "Spencer Dawkins" writes: > > > Spencer Dawkins has entered the following ballot position for > > draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-roadblock-avoidance-04: No Objection > > > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to

Re: [DNSOP] Spencer Dawkins' Yes on draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-terminology-04: (with COMMENT)

Hi, Paul, Thanks for the followup! That works ... Spencer On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 3:59 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote: > On 18 Sep 2015, at 13:41, Spencer Dawkins at IETF wrote: > > Hi, Paul, >> >> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 2:08 PM, Paul Hoffman >> wrote: >> >> O

Re: [DNSOP] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00: (with COMMENT)

Hi, Alec, On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 6:31 AM, Alec Muffett wrote: > Hello Spencer! > > I do have one observation that I haven't seen anyone else touch on: > > I thought .onion was tied closely to the TOR protocol, so I have no idea > why the second sentence in this paragraph is here, or what it mean

Re: [DNSOP] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00: (with COMMENT)

Hi, Christian, On Sep 3, 2015 01:14, "Christian Grothoff" wrote: > > On 09/03/2015 04:54 AM, Spencer Dawkins wrote: > > I thought .onion was tied closely to the TOR protocol, so I have no idea > > why the second sentence in this paragraph is here, or what it means, and > > neither the string "TOR