I have seen the ISC EDNS compliance report (beautiful thing really), but it
loks as though the focus is really on the name servers and name server
operators. Has a recent study been done to examine whether client side/ISP
firewalls are interfering with EDNS?
--
Glen Wiley
Principal Engineer
On 11/11/15, 5:01 PM, "Tony Finch" wrote:
>Paul Vixie wrote:
>> On Wednesday, November 11, 2015 04:41:27 PM Tony Finch wrote:
>> > Paul Vixie wrote:
>> >
>> > > yes, that's flooding the channel. you're allowed one work-stream per
>> > >
The draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-terminology draft will be helpful in normalizing
language in documentation and
for folks new to the industry, I like where it is heading. I¹d like to
recommend adding a few sentences to in the paragraphs on bailiwick. I
think the original text is pretty close but the
Dan,
This looks as though it will be a really interesting exercise. I will be there
in spirit (and in corporeal form Sunday afternoon).
--
Glen Wiley
Principal Engineer
Verisign, Inc.
(571) 230-7917
http://vbsdcon.com
A5E5 E373 3C75 5B3E 2E24
6A0F DC65 2354 9946 C63A
From: Dan York
Petr,
Have you taken a look at the getdns API specification that Paul Hoffman
put together at http://www.vpnc.org/getdns-api/ ?
This addresses many of your points for both stub resolvers and a recursive
resolver that would run on a platform local to the applications.
--
Glen Wiley
KK4SFV
Sr.
the community we will end up with
something that will move DNSSEC adoption to the next level.
--
Glen Wiley
KK4SFV
Sr. Engineer
The Hive, Verisign, Inc.
From: Richard Lamb richard.l...@icann.orgmailto:richard.l...@icann.org
Date: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 2:02 PM
To: Wiley, Glen gwi
On 12/3/13 5:20 PM, Stephane Bortzmeyer bortzme...@nic.fr wrote:
On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 01:13:26PM -0500,
Warren Kumari war...@kumari.net wrote
a message of 35 lines which said:
OK. And do note chaff may be a by-product of
draft-wkumari-dnsop-hammer.
Um, please explain.
Hammer (and