Re: [DNSOP] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8749 (7131)

2022-09-13 Thread Chris Smiley
Greetings, FYI - this report has been deleted as junk. Thank you. RFC Editor/cs > On Sep 13, 2022, at 1:30 PM, RFC Errata System > wrote: > > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8749, > "Moving DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV) to Historic Status". > >

Re: [DNSOP] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8749 (7131)

2022-09-13 Thread Dan Mahoney
As one of the authors of this RFC I agree with Mark Andrews' assessment. Also, there is no section 8749 in this rfc. -Dan > On Sep 13, 2022, at 14:41, Mark Andrews wrote: > > The word ‘deleted’ does not appear in RFC8749. The errata makes no sense. I > suggest that this errata is REJECTED.

Re: [DNSOP] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8749 (7131)

2022-09-13 Thread Mark Andrews
The word ‘deleted’ does not appear in RFC8749. The errata makes no sense. I suggest that this errata is REJECTED. -- Mark Andrews > On 14 Sep 2022, at 06:30, RFC Errata System wrote: > > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8749, > "Moving DNSSEC Lookaside Validation

[DNSOP] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8749 (7131)

2022-09-13 Thread RFC Errata System
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8749, "Moving DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV) to Historic Status". -- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7131 -- Type: