Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Re: signing parent-side NS (was: Re: Updating RFC 7344 for cross-NS consistency)

2022-07-29 Thread David Conrad
Hi, On Jul 29, 2022, at 12:53 AM, Petr Špaček wrote: > By any chance, do you remember in what iteration the DO=1 in query was > introduced? Mid- to late 2000/early 2001, after the 2nd iteration (using Ed’s terminology), but before the third. > I wonder what sort of disruption was anticipated/

Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Re: signing parent-side NS (was: Re: Updating RFC 7344 for cross-NS consistency)

2022-07-29 Thread Petr Špaček
On 28. 07. 22 22:05, Edward Lewis wrote: On 7/26/22, 3:05 PM, "DNSOP on behalf of Petr Špaček" wrote: Interesting history lesson, thank you. Can you elaborate on > therefore only one can be signed. please? What is the reasoning behind it? There were a few iterations in the developme

Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Re: signing parent-side NS (was: Re: Updating RFC 7344 for cross-NS consistency)

2022-07-28 Thread Edward Lewis
On 7/26/22, 3:05 PM, "DNSOP on behalf of Petr Špaček" wrote: >Interesting history lesson, thank you. >Can you elaborate on > > therefore only one can be signed. >please? >What is the reasoning behind it? There were a few iterations in the development of DNSSEC. RFC 4033-4035 are the third