On Mon, 2011-10-24 at 16:58 -0400, Keith Moore wrote:
On Oct 24, 2011, at 4:52 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
On 10/24/2011 05:16, Keith Moore wrote:
That's the point - search lists are not appropriate most of the time, and
it's very hard for software to distinguish the cases where they are
On Mon, 2011-10-24 at 19:30 -0400, Keith Moore wrote:
On Oct 24, 2011, at 6:50 PM, Jeffrey Hutzelman wrote:
So it seems that this question is already a matter of local policy,
which given the number and quality of the divergent views seems
eminently reasonable. Can we move on now?
On Sat, 2011-10-22 at 11:42 -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
In regards to 3, let's say I have a domain, example.org. In my network I
have various subdomains that represent various network segments, let's
say foo, bar, and baz. Personally, I find it convenient to put
'example.com' in the search list
On 10/23/2011 7:49 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
In message 96472fb7-8425-4928-8f55-2abf2cb59...@conundrum.com, Matthew
Pounse
tt writes:
On 2011/10/22, at 15:21, Keith Moore wrote:
On Oct 22, 2011, at 2:42 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
1. I think we're all in agreement that dot-terminated names
On Oct 24, 2011, at 6:50 PM, Jeffrey Hutzelman wrote:
So it seems that this question is already a matter of local policy,
which given the number and quality of the divergent views seems
eminently reasonable. Can we move on now?
No, because relying on local policy is not sufficient for
In message caf4+negchve6pchj-pkckc_7p-4yxqbvco3dqzv1ddiaptf...@mail.gmail.com
, Donald Eastlake writes:
Hi,
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 7:49 PM, Mark Andrews ma...@isc.org wrote:
In message 96472fb7-8425-4928-8f55-2abf2cb59...@conundrum.com, Matthew =
Pounse
tt writes:
On 2011/10/22,
Hi,
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 7:49 PM, Mark Andrews ma...@isc.org wrote:
In message 96472fb7-8425-4928-8f55-2abf2cb59...@conundrum.com, Matthew
Pounse
tt writes:
On 2011/10/22, at 15:21, Keith Moore wrote:
On Oct 22, 2011, at 2:42 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
1. I think we're all in
