Re: [DNSOP] [v6ops] [IANA #989438] ipv4only.arpa's delegation should be insecure.

> On 19 Jun 2018, at 11:35 am, Ted Lemon wrote: > > You should steal the text from the dot home RFC. > > On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 9:30 PM David Schinazi wrote: > Hi, responses inline. > >> On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 11:16 PM Mark Andrews wrote: >> >> This does not meet my requirements. There

Re: [DNSOP] [v6ops] [IANA #989438] ipv4only.arpa's delegation should be insecure.

You should steal the text from the dot home RFC. On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 9:30 PM David Schinazi wrote: > Hi, responses inline. > > On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 11:16 PM Mark Andrews wrote: > >> >> This does not meet my requirements. There is zero need for any part of >> the normal DNS resolution >

Re: [DNSOP] [v6ops] [IANA #989438] ipv4only.arpa's delegation should be insecure.

Hi, responses inline. > On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 11:16 PM Mark Andrews > wrote: > > This does not meet my requirements. There is zero need for any part of the > normal DNS resolution > process to know the IPV4ONLY.ARPA is special if IANA stopped signing the zone. Could

Re: [DNSOP] [v6ops] [IANA #989438] ipv4only.arpa's delegation should be insecure.

On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 11:16 PM Mark Andrews wrote: > > > On 13 Jun 2018, at 12:28 pm, David Schinazi wrote: > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > Stuart and I have a draft that attempts to address these issues, please > let us know if you think it does or doesn't. > > > >

Re: [DNSOP] [v6ops] [IANA #989438] ipv4only.arpa's delegation should be insecure.

-intarea-nat64-prefix-dhcp-option-01 Regards, Jordi -Mensaje original- De: DNSOP en nombre de Philip Homburg Fecha: miércoles, 13 de junio de 2018, 12:42 Para: CC: Stuart Cheshire , Michelle Cotton via RT , dnsop , David Schinazi Asunto: Re: [DNSOP] [v6ops] [IANA #989438

Re: [DNSOP] [v6ops] [IANA #989438] ipv4only.arpa's delegation should be insecure.

>https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-cheshire-sudn-ipv4only-dot-arpa > >From Section 6.2: 3. Name resolution APIs and libraries MUST recognize 'ipv4only.arpa' as special and MUST give it special treatment. Regardless of

Re: [DNSOP] [v6ops] [IANA #989438] ipv4only.arpa's delegation should be insecure.

> On 13 Jun 2018, at 12:28 pm, David Schinazi wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > Stuart and I have a draft that attempts to address these issues, please let > us know if you think it does or doesn't. > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-cheshire-sudn-ipv4only-dot-arpa > > Thanks, > David Schinazi

Re: [DNSOP] [v6ops] [IANA #989438] ipv4only.arpa's delegation should be insecure.

LGTM. It sounds like Mark is arguing that RFC6761 also needs updated. Possibly this document could do that, but it would need to be reframed a bit. On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 7:28 PM, David Schinazi wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Stuart and I have a draft that attempts to address these issues, please

Re: [DNSOP] [v6ops] [IANA #989438] ipv4only.arpa's delegation should be insecure.

Hi everyone, Stuart and I have a draft that attempts to address these issues, please let us know if you think it does or doesn't. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-cheshire-sudn-ipv4only-dot-arpa Thanks, David Schinazi > On