Thanks Benno. Thanks all reviewers for your time reviewing ATR draft. I'm
sorry it is not adopted in WG but I still think the draft and the peer
reviews help us to understand the problems better.
Davey
> -邮件原件-
> 发件人: DNSOP [mailto:dnsop-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Benno Overeinder
> 发送时间:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 7:10 PM Davey Song(宋林健) wrote:
> Hi Brian,
>
> Thanks for your questions. Reply inline
>
> >(1) Has your testing revealed *where* the IPv6 fragmentation is
> occurring? IIRC, IPv6 requires the originating host to do so. And
> originating UDP packet size will be the
(Top-reply, apologies for those offended by this practice.)
I also oppose adoption (at least of the draft in its current form).
Very quick questions:
(1) Has your testing revealed *where* the IPv6 fragmentation is occurring?
IIRC, IPv6 requires the originating host to do so. And originating UDP
Moin!
On 22 Jan 2019, at 9:50, Davey Song wrote:
It is not rare. It is just under the water. You cannot run a ship
unaware of it, especially towards IPv6-only future. Here are some
pointer and number are given:
[1] presents a 28.26% ~ 55.23% packets drop rate for IPv6 fragements.
[2]
Thanks for all commenter's, I appreciate your frankness and vote based on your
technical sense. I understand your push back especially considering the DNS
camel stuff. I try to reply some of comments here.
Some people argues on the problem statement of this draft.
> Peter: Meanwhile, we have
