On 10/10/2018 8:43 AM, "Mirja Kühlewind (IETF)" wrote:
However re-consider the appropriate intended status for this doc!
I assume that is still something that the IESG resolves, independent of
whatever is on the draft.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
__
Hi Dave,
no I didn’t see that mail (quite a bit behind mail at the moment) but looked it
up now. I have to say the argument of have a clean registry doc is not that
convincing for me but it this fine. However re-consider the appropriate
intended status for this doc!
Mirja
> Am 10.10.2018 um
On 10/10/2018 7:26 AM, Mirja Kühlewind wrote:
I don't quite understand why it was seen as beneficial by the group that this
doc has been split up,
Did you see the note I posted yesterday about this (in the context of
having the base refer to the -fix, but including an explanation for the
spl
Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf-fix-04: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refe
