Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-delegation-only​: exchanging DS set

2020-08-03 Thread Vladimír Čunát
On 7/31/20 2:34 PM, Paul Wouters wrote: > The process of a rogue parent is not a purely technical one. It can include a > legal system, a payment dispute, and many other things. > > Per definition, it will be a manual process to confirm if a “changed child” > is a legitimate change or not.

Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-delegation-only​: exchanging DS set

2020-07-31 Thread Paul Wouters
On Jul 31, 2020, at 05:06, Vladimír Čunát wrote: > > Hello dnsop. > > So far it's been clear. But now... how do we know that this fake > victim.evil DS set was not submitted by the registrant? I assume every > registrant is supposed to watch the logs from everyone for such fakes? > Sounds

[DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-delegation-only​: exchanging DS set

2020-07-31 Thread Vladimír Čunát
Hello dnsop. Let me start a simple thought experiment - attacking the planned scheme.  It feels like I'm missing some part of the defense. A .evil registry is using the DELEGATION_ONLY flag.  They additionally sign a different victim.evil DS set, say adding hash of a DNSKEY they generated