[DNSOP] Comments on draft-rssac-dnsop-rfc2870bis-04.txt

2012-02-06 Thread Paul Hoffman
Greetings again. This looks much better than the -00, but still needs more effort. The language in the text is still very rough (larger than nits, not quite as bad as confusing). I believe that the amount of copy editing done by the RFC Editor depends on the stream through which you submit the

Re: [DNSOP] Comments on draft-rssac-dnsop-rfc2870bis-04.txt

2012-02-06 Thread bmanning
Hello Paul. First off, this is an RSSAC document so it is not clear why you think someone from the root opserator community should do the copy editing. The paragraph at the end of section 1 (the isn't really 2119 language text) is quite cute and will cause you a world of pain and delay.

Re: [DNSOP] Comments on draft-rssac-dnsop-rfc2870bis-04.txt

2012-02-06 Thread Paul Hoffman
On Feb 6, 2012, at 5:19 PM, bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com wrote: First off, this is an RSSAC document so it is not clear why you think someone from the root opserator community should do the copy editing. There is a large/complete overlap between the RSSAC and the root server operators.

Re: [DNSOP] Comments on draft-rssac-dnsop-rfc2870bis-04.txt

2012-02-06 Thread bmanning
On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 05:52:12PM -0500, Paul Hoffman wrote: On Feb 6, 2012, at 5:19 PM, bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com wrote: First off, this is an RSSAC document so it is not clear why you think someone from the root opserator community should do the copy editing. There is a