This has developed into a debate on the merits of Sullivan's document
draft-dnsop-reverse-mapping-considerations and my (Anderson's) document
draft-anderson-reverse-dns-status.
Inline:
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
I have read Dean's comments, and I believe they reveal that Dean
hat wg-co-chair=on
The 19 August cut-off having passed, and having seen no support for
WG adoption of draft-anderson-reverse-dns-status from anyone but the
draft's author, the Chicago decision not to adopt the draft stands.
/hat
___
DNSOP
Dear colleagues (Dean especially),
On Mon, Aug 13, 2007 at 03:47:30PM -0400, Dean Anderson wrote:
There is no waste. Those efforts culminated in my draft, and your draft.
If it weren't for those discussions, I wouldn't have written my draft.
[. . .]
I don't want to spend too much more time
Dear colleagues,
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 03:25:58PM -0400, Dean Anderson wrote:
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
Dean, do you solicit my feedback as to what
changes would be necessary to obtain my (individual) support? If so,
I will send those remarks.
/hat
Yes, thanks.
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 07:00:36PM -0400, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
I note that I asked explicitly about two sets of remarks from the
-anderson- draft that the current editors thought were possible
candidates for inclusion in the current working group draft, and
received no feedback in the
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
Dear colleagues,
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 04:33:18PM -0400, Dean Anderson wrote:
Would it be too much to ask the 12 people who read the draft, what
problems they have with the draft?
What changes would be necessary to obtain support?
Dear colleagues,
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 04:33:18PM -0400, Dean Anderson wrote:
Would it be too much to ask the 12 people who read the draft, what
problems they have with the draft?
What changes would be necessary to obtain support?
hat=none
I have read the draft. Dean, do you solicit my
[Resending with fixed subject line, sorry for the duplication --sra]
At Fri, 6 Jul 2007 11:45:25 -0400 (EDT), Dean Anderson wrote:
I would like to have the WG discuss taking up my draft
(draft-anderson-reverse-dns-status) as a WG document.
Thanks,
--Dean
hat
