> I have read the draft, found no problems other than the missing
> security considerations ( I don't see any particular security
> considerations ), and fully support it.
Thanks - and that's why the Security Considerations is "TODO" - we're not
sure what they are yet. The only significant risk
ueries being sent by servers that are not aware of LOCAL.ARPA. Which
is the most appropriate domain to use I am unable to judge.
Regards,
George
- Original Message -
From: ray.bel...@nominet.org.uk
To: dnsop@ietf.org
Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2009 4:00 PM
Subject: [DNSOP] Fw: New Version No
