Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: Comments on draft-ietf-dnsop-qname-minimisation

2015-01-08 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 10:49:04AM -0500, Shumon Huque wrote a message of 113 lines which said: > Here's one example I'm familiar with (the website of my previous employer, > U of Penn, which uses the Akamai CDN): > > $ ./test.py www.upenn.edu Version -01 of the draft (expected this week-end

Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: Comments on draft-ietf-dnsop-qname-minimisation

2015-01-06 Thread Shumon Huque
from draft-ietf-dnsop-qname-minimisation: 2. Qname minimisation > >The idea is to minimise the amount of data sent from the DNS >resolver. When a resolver receives the query "What is the >record for www.example.com?", it sends to the root (assuming a cold >resolver, whose ca

Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: Comments on draft-ietf-dnsop-qname-minimisation

2015-01-06 Thread Warren Kumari
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 5:22 PM, Brian Dickson wrote: > I'm a big fan of this. > > These comments are meant to be constructive, and with the goal of improving > the draft quality and/or quality of the underlying protocol. > > And, of course, I speak only for myself. > > In no particular order: > >

Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: Comments on draft-ietf-dnsop-qname-minimisation

2015-01-06 Thread Shumon Huque
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 5:22 PM, Brian Dickson < brian.peter.dick...@gmail.com> wrote: > > - Another thing to possibly call out is the behavior of some name servers > when the QNAME is an Empty Non-Terminal, e.g. a non-zone-cut with a child, > but no RRs at the owner name. I seem to recall somethi

[DNSOP] Fwd: Comments on draft-ietf-dnsop-qname-minimisation

2014-12-29 Thread Brian Dickson
I'm a big fan of this. These comments are meant to be constructive, and with the goal of improving the draft quality and/or quality of the underlying protocol. And, of course, I speak only for myself. In no particular order: - In section 3, it might be good to add a paragraph about the implicat