Implementation reports are indeed good, yes.
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 10:27 AM, Job Snijders wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 7:22 PM, Tom Pusateri wrote:
> >> On Jun 12, 2018, at 10:28 AM, Job Snijders wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 3:09 PM, Ted Lemon wrote:
> >>> Yes. I'm using it rig
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 7:22 PM, Tom Pusateri wrote:
>> On Jun 12, 2018, at 10:28 AM, Job Snijders wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 3:09 PM, Ted Lemon wrote:
>>> Yes. I'm using it right now to implement draft-ietf-dnssd-mdns-relay, and
>>> that implementation is working and interoperating.
> On Jun 12, 2018, at 10:28 AM, Job Snijders wrote:
>
> Dear Ted,
>
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 3:09 PM, Ted Lemon wrote:
>> Yes. I'm using it right now to implement draft-ietf-dnssd-mdns-relay, and
>> that implementation is working and interoperating. I don't know of another
>> independent
The BCP14 keyword compliance question sounds like a worthwhile exercise,
but I can't do it this week. I'm certainly not deliberately violating the
specification. As to what implementation it is, it's a modification to
the mDNSResponder code base to support mDNS queries over the mDNS relay
proto
Dear Ted,
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 3:09 PM, Ted Lemon wrote:
> Yes. I'm using it right now to implement draft-ietf-dnssd-mdns-relay, and
> that implementation is working and interoperating. I don't know of another
> independent implementation yet, unfortunately.
Can you elaborate a bit more?
Yes. I'm using it right now to implement draft-ietf-dnssd-mdns-relay, and
that implementation is working and interoperating. I don't know of
another independent implementation yet, unfortunately.
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 4:36 AM, Job Snijders wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Are there any implementations
Hi all,
Are there any implementations of this protocol extension?
Kind regards,
Job
-- Forwarded message --
From: The IESG
Date: Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 6:20 PM
Subject: [DNSOP] Last Call:
(DNS Stateful Operations) to Proposed Standard
To: IETF-Announce
Cc: Tim Wicinski , dnsop@
