On Tue, 2017-03-14 at 09:04 +0100, Jakob Schlyter wrote:
> This draft should be of interest to this WG, providing an alternative
> to
> draft-wouters-sury-dnsop-algorithm-update.
>
> jakob
I like this simple short draft. I prefer its terminology. The only tiny
issue I have is with the word
Thank you for the draft.
I have to say that from my perspective the
draft-wouters-sury-dnsop-algorithm-update selected a better approach to
the problem. IMHO it is important to distinguish consumers and producers
of signatures as discussed in the original thread.
While I agree that draft-wouters-
Jakob,
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 09:04:53AM +0100, Jakob Schlyter wrote:
> This draft should be of interest to this WG, providing an alternative to
> draft-wouters-sury-dnsop-algorithm-update.
>
> jakob
>
> > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-arends-dnsop-dnssec-algorithm-update-00
This i
This draft should be of interest to this WG, providing an alternative to
draft-wouters-sury-dnsop-algorithm-update.
jakob
Forwarded message:
From: internet-dra...@ietf.org
To: Roy Arends , Jakob Schlyter
, Matt Larson
Subject: New Version Notification for
draft-arends-dnsop-dnssec
