Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-wkumari-dnsop-multiple-responses-00.txt

2015-01-13 Thread Mukund Sivaraman
Hi Warren I didn't read the whole thing, but quickly browsed it. I will follow up with a better review, but here's one point: > 2. Additional records MUST only be served over TCP connections. > This is to mitigate Denial of Service reflection attacks.[1] I think this draft should not co

[DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-wkumari-dnsop-multiple-responses-00.txt

2015-01-11 Thread Warren Kumari
Hi all, This document may contain much that makes folk grumpy. It proposes allowing an authoritative nameserver to return additional information (surprisingly, in the Additional section), and have recursives trust it (because it is DNSSEC signed). This makes responses larger, and so we propose an