Hi!
Then, what should we do? If we change the intended status to standards
track, will it be ok? Will it require more steps to get it approved?
Can we possibly get the draft approved as an informational RFC?
--
Boris
18.10.2022 17:58, Ron Even пишет:
Hi, your response does not address my co
Hi,
your response does not address my comments.
1. whis is this an informational RFC and not a standard track RFC.
2. What is requested from IANA. ths text you wrote and I copied is not a
directive to IANA that is clear
Roni
On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 2:44 PM Макаренко Борис
wrote:
> Hello, Roni!
>
Hello, Roni!
The old algorithms GOST R 34.11-94, GOST R 34.10-2001 and GOST R
34.11-2001 are considered obsolete. They are now replaced with GOST R
34.10-2012 (digital signature) and GOST R 34.11-2012 (hash function).
Basically, the use of GOST algorithms in DNSSEC remains the same as
describ
Reviewer: Roni Even
Review result: Almost Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more inform
