Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Mar 2015, Tony Finch wrote:
> > > All of those require round trips.
> >
> > No they do not. Please stop repeating this falsehood.
>
> paul@bofh:~$ sudo unbound-control flush_zone nohats.ca
> paul@bofh:~$ dig a +dnssec www.nohats.ca @127.0.0.1
Oh come on, surely y
On Tue, 10 Mar 2015, Tony Finch wrote:
Tony,
Without this extension the typical number of RTTs required is 1, so this
isn't a reduction.
When you have nothing of nohats.ca in your cache, and you ask for the
A record of www.nohats.ca, you will normally get back the A record
and the RRSIG. Then
Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Mar 2015, Tony Finch wrote:
> >
> > Without this extension the typical number of RTTs required is 1, so this
> > isn't a reduction.
>
> When you have nothing of nohats.ca in your cache, and you ask for the
> A record of www.nohats.ca, you will normally get back the
On Mon, 9 Mar 2015, Tony Finch wrote:
The justification in the introduction is misleading:
This document specifies an EDNS0 extension that allows a validating
Resolver running as a Forwarder to open a TCP connection to another
Resolver and request a DNS chain answer using one DNS query/an
The justification in the introduction is misleading:
This document specifies an EDNS0 extension that allows a validating
Resolver running as a Forwarder to open a TCP connection to another
Resolver and request a DNS chain answer using one DNS query/answer
pair. This reduces the number
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations Working Group
of the IETF.
Title : Chain Query requests in DNS
Author : Paul Wouters
Filename: draft-
