Jim Reid wrote:
> > On 7 Oct 2016, at 03:33, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
> >
> > Protocol matters. And just because IANA does 'assignments' that are not
> > 'registrations' doesn't mean that is right or should continue.
>
> I’m sure the RIRs and the hundreds of millions of people who are using
> On 7 Oct 2016, at 03:33, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
>
> Protocol matters. And just because IANA does 'assignments' that are not
> 'registrations' doesn't mean that is right or should continue.
I’m sure the RIRs and the hundreds of millions of people who are using IP
addresses because of IA
No it is not a pedantic difference.
If it isn't in a registry it didn't happen.
It is like when someone decided to do an April Fools RFC which used a code
point in PKIX space that wasn't actually registered with IANA. That caused
some real chaos.
Protocol matters. And just because IANA does 'ass
On 6 Oct 2016, at 18:09, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 5:13 PM, Jaap Akkerhuis
wrote:
RFC 3490 does say something about the ACE prefix.
It says it has been registered but not where and there is no IANA
registry that references RFC3490
It does not say it was "register
On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 5:13 PM, Jaap Akkerhuis wrote:
> Robert Edmonds writes:
>
> > Donald Eastlake wrote:
> > > Sure, you can consider the root zone to be the registry for TLDs but
> the
> > > point is the xn-- labels are recommended to be interpreted specially
> at the
> > > user interfac
Robert Edmonds writes:
> Donald Eastlake wrote:
> > Sure, you can consider the root zone to be the registry for TLDs but the
> > point is the xn-- labels are recommended to be interpreted specially at the
> > user interface at all levels...
>
> Nor would this say anything about "CCHH" pref
Donald Eastlake wrote:
> Sure, you can consider the root zone to be the registry for TLDs but the
> point is the xn-- labels are recommended to be interpreted specially at the
> user interface at all levels...
Nor would this say anything about "CCHH" prefixed labels in general.
At the TLD level t
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 3:14 PM, Jim Reid wrote:
> > On 6 Oct 2016, at 18:59, Donald Eastlake wrote:
> > I don't believe there is a registry.
>
> Actually there is. Sort of:
% whois -h whois.iana.org テスト
> % IANA WHOIS server
> % for more information on IANA, visit http://www.iana.org
> % T
> On 6 Oct 2016, at 18:59, Donald Eastlake wrote:
>
> I don't believe there is a registry.
Actually there is. Sort of:
% whois -h whois.iana.org テスト
% IANA WHOIS server
% for more information on IANA, visit http://www.iana.org
% This query returned 1 object
domain: テスト
domain-ace: XN-
On 6 Oct 2016, at 10:08, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
I have been looking for the IANA registry in which the IDNA prefix
xn-- is
allocated and have not been able to find it. I can see the following
possibilities
1) There isn't such a registry. The allocation is purely ad hoc
2) There is a regi
I don't believe there is a registry. It would seem reasonable to reserve
labels starting with all other [a-z][a-z]-- besides xn-- and establish a
registry. (To avoid people trying to squat on names in advance, the "xn"
was selected by the same sort of publicly verifiable random process as
nomcom vo
On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 1:24 PM, wrote:
>
> >I have been looking for the IANA registry in which the IDNA prefix xn--
> is allocated and have not been able to find it. I can see the following
> possibilities
>
> >1) There isn't such a registry. The allocation is purely ad hoc
>
> >2) There is
>I have been looking for the IANA registry in which the IDNA prefix xn-- is
>allocated and have not been able to find it. I can see the following
>possibilities
>1) There isn't such a registry. The allocation is purely ad hoc
>2) There is a registry but none of the IDNA RFCs bother to list it
I have been looking for the IANA registry in which the IDNA prefix xn-- is
allocated and have not been able to find it. I can see the following
possibilities
1) There isn't such a registry. The allocation is purely ad hoc
2) There is a registry but none of the IDNA RFCs bother to list it as a
nor
14 matches
Mail list logo
