-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/26/2011 06:58 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
> To restart the dormant discussion on NSCP...
>
keeping it on life-support :)
> On 13 Dec 2010, at 08:51, Jelte Jansen wrote:
>
>> It has been said (perhaps by you) that perhaps we ought to think about
To restart the dormant discussion on NSCP...
On 13 Dec 2010, at 08:51, Jelte Jansen wrote:
> It has been said (perhaps by you) that perhaps we ought to think about
> splitting
> up the data model and the protocol. I'm not sure about the advantage of that
> (well, apart from doc length), but thou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/07/2010 12:36 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
> At the WG meeting in Beijing, the somewhat inconclusive discussion on a
> nameserver control protocol was ended by the suggestion that the authors of
> the two drafts discussed should write a short piec
At the WG meeting in Beijing, the somewhat inconclusive discussion on a
nameserver control protocol was ended by the suggestion that the authors of the
two drafts discussed should write a short piece discussing the pros and cons of
their proposals and post it to the list. This is that piece for
