Re: [DNSOP] NSCP Pros and Cons: draft-dickinson-dnsop-nameserver-control

2011-02-03 Thread Jelte Jansen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/26/2011 06:58 PM, Stephen Morris wrote: To restart the dormant discussion on NSCP... keeping it on life-support :) On 13 Dec 2010, at 08:51, Jelte Jansen wrote: It has been said (perhaps by you) that perhaps we ought to think about

Re: [DNSOP] NSCP Pros and Cons: draft-dickinson-dnsop-nameserver-control

2011-01-26 Thread Stephen Morris
To restart the dormant discussion on NSCP... On 13 Dec 2010, at 08:51, Jelte Jansen wrote: It has been said (perhaps by you) that perhaps we ought to think about splitting up the data model and the protocol. I'm not sure about the advantage of that (well, apart from doc length), but thought

Re: [DNSOP] NSCP Pros and Cons: draft-dickinson-dnsop-nameserver-control

2010-12-13 Thread Jelte Jansen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/07/2010 12:36 PM, Stephen Morris wrote: At the WG meeting in Beijing, the somewhat inconclusive discussion on a nameserver control protocol was ended by the suggestion that the authors of the two drafts discussed should write a short piece

[DNSOP] NSCP Pros and Cons: draft-dickinson-dnsop-nameserver-control

2010-12-07 Thread Stephen Morris
At the WG meeting in Beijing, the somewhat inconclusive discussion on a nameserver control protocol was ended by the suggestion that the authors of the two drafts discussed should write a short piece discussing the pros and cons of their proposals and post it to the list. This is that piece