I have a question related to RFC2317 "Classless IN-ADDR.ARPA delegation."
Earlier this year, I switched from a class C bank of 256 addresses to
a reduced set of 32 ips (/27). To get PTR queries to work, RFC2317
was referred by my ISP to prepare the delegation.
Having implemented RFC2317, I
Hello.
On 08/24/2017 05:46 PM, Hector Santos wrote:
> [...] Not expecting this in my DNS resolver code, I modified the
> resolver to take the CNAMEs into account and return the host names
> instead. Was this the correct thing to do, thus providing the same
> results regardless of the query locati
This is why rfc 2308 definition of qname is correct.
On August 24, 2017 9:46:58 AM MDT, Hector Santos wrote:
>I have a question related to RFC2317 "Classless IN-ADDR.ARPA
>delegation."
>
>Earlier this year, I switched from a class C bank of 256 addresses to
>a reduced set of 32 ips (/27). To g
On 08/24/2017 09:46 AM, Hector Santos wrote:
Not expecting this in my DNS resolver code, I modified the resolver to
take the CNAMEs into account and return the host names instead. Was
this the correct thing to do, thus providing the same results regardless
of the query location?
This is one
On 8/24/2017 1:31 PM, Grant Taylor wrote:
Before I release my updates, I wonder if this was the right thing to
do.
I prefer to use a different method to do classless in-addr.arpa
delegation.
Specifically, I ask ISPs to put an NS record for the IP(s) in question
pointing to my own DNS server.
On 8/24/2017 12:06 PM, Vladimír Čunát wrote:
Hello.
On 08/24/2017 05:46 PM, Hector Santos wrote:
[...] Not expecting this in my DNS resolver code, I modified the
resolver to take the CNAMEs into account and return the host names
instead. Was this the correct thing to do, thus providing the sam
On 08/26/2017 12:23 PM, Hector Santos wrote:
> This was done, at least the first part of providing the ISP the two NS
> servers required. They used RFC2317 to setup the cname delegation. On
> my servers, I had done what you suggestion with the second method using
> a parent c.b.a.in-addr.arpa zone
Hector Santos wrote:
>
> Not expecting this in my DNS resolver code, I modified the resolver to take
> the CNAMEs into account and return the host names instead. Was this the
> correct thing to do, thus providing the same results regardless of the query
> location?
Yes.
You should also make sur
On 8/30/2017 3:53 PM, Tony Finch wrote:
Hector Santos wrote:
Not expecting this in my DNS resolver code, I modified the resolver to take
the CNAMEs into account and return the host names instead. Was this the
correct thing to do, thus providing the same results regardless of the query
locatio
