On Mon, 8 Oct 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 7 Oct 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The diagram looks like:
Ax Bx
||
Xa---Xb
||
LBa--LBb
\ /
B{1..n} (backend) servers 1 through N
On Xa, the preferred path for S is - LBa.
On Xb, the preferred
Brian Dickson wrote:
It operates in exactly the same way, as if there were two equal cost
routes to two or more routers, each
advertising the existence of one of these servers, on the other side
of a PPLB router - except that it has
the ability to handle the state issue for TCP.
Anyone who
On Thu, 4 Oct 2007, Brian Dickson wrote:
bill fumerola wrote:
not all load balancers work the same.
direct server return aka one-arm load balancing does no translation or
rewrite of any headers (l3 or l4). all it does is make a switching
decision based on health check and other weighting
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 08:10:03PM -0400, Dean Anderson wrote:
But none of this is relevant to the claims that Hickson made.
no, but they're directly relevant to the claims that you made:
direct server return aka one-arm load balancing does no translation or
rewrite of any headers (l3 or l4).
On Thu, 4 Oct 2007, bill fumerola wrote:
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 08:10:03PM -0400, Dean Anderson wrote:
But none of this is relevant to the claims that Hickson made.
no, but they're directly relevant to the claims that you made:
direct server return aka one-arm load balancing does no
On Thu, 4 Oct 2007, bill fumerola wrote:
i just must be a fraud and liar, not to mention a junior sysadmin.
There's nothing wrong with being a junior admin. I was one once, too. I
was a programmer before I was an admin, and I sort of became an admin
because I screwed up. Well, this wasn't my
On Tue, 2 Oct 2007, John Kristoff wrote:
On Tue, 2 Oct 2007 21:59:33 -0400 (EDT)
Dean Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In fact, using authority servers is _less_ risk to the abuser, because
to compose the reflector attacks, s/he has to crack into a server,
craft a record,
One can
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 12:33:09PM -0400, Dean Anderson wrote:
Then GROW considers an Anycast Draft, by your company.
Just as a point of information, Afilias (in any of its guises --
Afilias Canada, Afilias USA, c. c.) has never written any Internet
Draft. Afilias does employ people who are
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 12:33:09PM -0400, Dean Anderson wrote:
No, that isn't anycast. A loadbalancer is actually a stateful NAT with
several different hosts behind the load balancing NAT. Those
loadbalancer devices you buy from cisco and other companies are
specialized NAT boxes. The servers
On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, bill fumerola wrote:
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 12:33:09PM -0400, Dean Anderson wrote:
No, that isn't anycast. A loadbalancer is actually a stateful NAT with
several different hosts behind the load balancing NAT. Those
loadbalancer devices you buy from cisco and other
bill fumerola wrote:
not all load balancers work the same.
direct server return aka one-arm load balancing does no translation or
rewrite of any headers (l3 or l4). all it does is make a switching
decision based on health check and other weighting criteria.
Just to clarify, for those who
Dean Anderson wrote:
The load balancer is really just a special kind of stateful NAT.
No.
Load balancers can load balance, without any translation being done at all.
And a load balancer is by definition doing *anycast*.
The same address is used as a destination, and the packets are
12 matches
Mail list logo
