Re: [DNSOP] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec3-guidance-08: (with COMMENT)

2022-06-02 Thread Wes Hardaker
Petr Špaček writes: > Sorry for being so late on this ... Thanks Petr! -- Wes Hardaker USC/ISI ___ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Re: [DNSOP] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec3-guidance-08: (with COMMENT)

2022-06-01 Thread Petr Špaček
On 24. 05. 22 18:21, Wes Hardaker wrote: ** Section 2.2. In general, NSEC3 with the Opt-Out flag enabled should only be used in large, highly dynamic zones with a small percentage of signed delegations. Operationally, this allows for fewer signature creations when new delegatio

Re: [DNSOP] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec3-guidance-08: (with COMMENT)

2022-05-24 Thread Wes Hardaker
Roman Danyliw via Datatracker writes: > ** I support Paul Wouter’s DISCUSS position. Like Alvaro and Francesca also > commented, this document appears to be changing the behavior of RFC5155. It > should formally update it in the meta data. Specifically: As discussed in other threads, the next

[DNSOP] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec3-guidance-08: (with COMMENT)

2022-05-10 Thread Roman Danyliw via Datatracker
Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec3-guidance-08: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refe