On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 9:39 AM, Spencer Dawkins at IETF <
spencerdawkins.i...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, Ted,
>
> Chopping down to clearing my Discuss, and one wording suggestion for new
> text ...
>
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 1:41 PM Ted Lemon wrote:
>
>> On Jul 27, 2018, at 12:33 AM, Spencer
Hi, Ted,
Chopping down to clearing my Discuss, and one wording suggestion for new
text ...
On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 1:41 PM Ted Lemon wrote:
> On Jul 27, 2018, at 12:33 AM, Spencer Dawkins <
> spencerdawkins.i...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I really like this document, and think it's headed the right
On Jul 31, 2018, at 2:41 PM, Ted Lemon wrote:
> The client may perform as many DNS operations as it wishes using the
> -newly created DSO Session. Operations SHOULD be pipelined (i.e., the
> -client doesn't need wait for a response before sending the next message).
> +newly created DSO Session.
On Jul 27, 2018, at 12:33 AM, Spencer Dawkins
wrote:
> I really like this document, and think it's headed the right direction. Of
> course I have four pages of comments, because reasons, but the only part I'm
> really confused about is this one ...
>
> I would have thought that if you end up
Hi Spencer, hi authors,
please see a few comments below. More might be coming as I’m currently
reviewing the doc.
> Am 27.07.2018 um 06:33 schrieb Spencer Dawkins
> :
>
> Spencer Dawkins has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-dnsop-session-signal-12: Discuss
>
> When
Hi, Benjamin,
On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 12:33 PM Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 09:33:20PM -0700, Spencer Dawkins wrote:
> > --
> > COMMENT:
> >
On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 09:33:20PM -0700, Spencer Dawkins wrote:
> --
> COMMENT:
> --
[snip]
>
> This next one is well within the "Spencer wouldn't have done it
