Hi, Paul,
Thanks for the followup! That works ...
Spencer
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 3:59 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> On 18 Sep 2015, at 13:41, Spencer Dawkins at IETF wrote:
>
> Hi, Paul,
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 2:08 PM, Paul Hoffman
>> wrote:
>>
>> On 16 Sep 2015, at 9:52, Spencer Dawkins
On 18 Sep 2015, at 13:41, Spencer Dawkins at IETF wrote:
Hi, Paul,
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 2:08 PM, Paul Hoffman
wrote:
On 16 Sep 2015, at 9:52, Spencer Dawkins wrote:
If this
For example, at the time this document is published, the "au" TLD
is not considered a public suffix, but the
On 16 Sep 2015, at 9:52, Spencer Dawkins wrote:
If this
For example, at the time this document is published, the "au" TLD
is not considered a public suffix, but the "com.au" domain is.
(Note that this example might change in the future.)
is intended to say that a subdomain may be a
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 09:52:12AM -0700,
Spencer Dawkins wrote
a message of 75 lines which said:
> In this text
>
> Some servers do not honor the TTL on an
> RRset from the authoritative servers, such as when the
> authoritative data has a very short TTL.
>
> I wasn'
