Hi
The WGLC ended on this, and there was strong consensus to move this
document forward. Thanks to all the folks who gave very constructive
comments, and thanks to the authors for addressing all the issues raised
during the process. I'll be submitting this shortly.
tim
On 10/5/15 4:08 PM
> On 15 Oct 2015, at 18:00, 神明達哉 wrote:
>
> I see your point. But whether the updated notification from the
> server works relies on whether the client includes an OPT RR in
> subsequent queries, ambiguity on the latter can easily lead to
> interoperability problem. So I thought this should be
At Thu, 15 Oct 2015 16:32:40 +0100,
Sara Dickinson wrote:
> My hesitation here is that if it is a SHOULD, then I think the
> document would need a bit more detail regarding what ‘regularly’
> means, rather than simply saying the precise behaviour is out of
> scope. I like to think that when somet
> On 15 Oct 2015, at 02:29, 神明達哉 mailto:jin...@wide.ad.jp>>
> wrote:
>
> At Wed, 14 Oct 2015 11:55:02 +0100,
>
> I have no objection to this text per se, but the described reason why
> the client might want to do this is different from what I intended. I
> was more concerned about the case whe
At Wed, 14 Oct 2015 11:55:02 +0100,
Sara Dickinson wrote:
> > I've read the 03 version of draft. It's very well written and I've
> > not found any critical technical issues. So I basically think it's
> > ready to ship.
> > I have a couple of minor comments, which the authors might want to
> >
> On 7 Oct 2015, at 18:17, 神明達哉 wrote:
>
>
> I've read the 03 version of draft. It's very well written and I've
> not found any critical technical issues. So I basically think it's
> ready to ship.
>
Hi,
Many thanks for the review.
> I have a couple of minor comments, which the authors mi
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 1:08 PM, Tim WIcinski wrote:
> This starts a Working Group Last Call for
> draft-ietf-dnsop-edns-tcp-keepalive
> Current versions of the draft is available here:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-edns-tcp-keepalive/
>
> The chairs feel the authors have
