Hi Duane,
On Wed, Jul 5, 2023 at 18:32, Wessels, Duane
<[dwessels=40verisign@dmarc.ietf.org](mailto:On Wed, Jul 5, 2023 at 18:32,
Wessels, Duane < wrote:
> On Jun 30, 2023, at 2:32 PM, Joe Abley wrote:
>
>> I wonder whether another subsection of section 2 would be useful to discuss
>>
> On Jun 30, 2023, at 2:32 PM, Joe Abley wrote:
>
>
>
> I have read -04. i like it. I think it's useful and sensible and it should be
> published. Whether this particular rev is ready for publication I would say
> depends on whether the authors disagree with all the pedantic nonsense that
All
The Working Group Last Call has completed and the chairs thank everyone for
their comments.
It appears that the authors have addressed all issues, and the document is
ready to advance.
tim
On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 11:00 AM Tim Wicinski wrote:
> All
>
> This starts a Working Group Last
On Jun 21, 2023, at 11:00, Tim Wicinski wrote:
> This starts a Working Group Last Call for
> draft-ietf-dnsop-caching-resolution-failures
>
> Current versions of the draft is available here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-caching-resolution-failures/
>
> The Current
On 26/06/2023 16:47, Peter van Dijk via Datatracker via dnsdir wrote:
The document has not seen a lot of WG discussion; I hope
this means people have read it and generally agree.
Yes, I've read through the document now again and I generally agree with it.
(But I'm afraid I can't think about
All
This starts a Working Group Last Call for
draft-ietf-dnsop-caching-resolution-failures
Current versions of the draft is available here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-caching-resolution-failures/
The Current Intended Status of this document is: Proposed
Standard/Standards
