ietf-dns...@johnbond.org wrote:
>
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-andrews-dnsext-udp-fragmentation-01 is
> worth a mention specifically in relation to PMTUD
Thanks for the pointer!
Tony.
--
f.anthony.n.finchhttp://dotat.at/ - I xn--zr8h punycode
Northeast Viking, North Utsire: Southeas
> On 21 Mar 2018, at 16:10, Tony Finch wrote:
>
> Here are some sketchy notes on what this might say...
>
> * client side
>
>* implement PMTUD by probing with diferent EDNS buffer sizes
>
> * does it make sense for a server to try to work out if the client is
> doing PMTUD, or i
Flattered to be mentioned. Specially thanks to Geoff and Joao for their
effort to demontrate ATR with measurement and facts. You did what I desired
but failed to do.
If you think ATR is worth of doing, I'm looking forward to more comments to
improve it towards a formal document.
-Davey
On 22 Marc
Tony Finch wrote:
>
> Here are some sketchy notes on what this might say...
Geoff Huston just told me I need to read Davey Song's very clever
"additional truncated response" and that he would roast my suggestions
if I didn't mention ATR :-)
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-song-atr-large-resp
ht
Mukund Sivaraman wrote:
>
> Some topics in the same area:
Thanks for your thoughts :-)
WRT Bert's camel, the draft I have in mind is just implementation advice
within the existing protocol. Part of the idea is to reduce fragmentation
in the presence of old deployed software, e.g. new client uses
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 04:10:15PM +, Tony Finch wrote:
> In the intarea meeting, there was some discussion of
> "IP fragmentation considered fragile"
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bonica-intarea-frag-fragile
>
> That draft correctly calls out the DNS as particularly problematic wrt
> fr
In the intarea meeting, there was some discussion of
"IP fragmentation considered fragile"
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bonica-intarea-frag-fragile
That draft correctly calls out the DNS as particularly problematic wrt
fragmentation, so I think it might be worth writing a dnsop draft that
exp
