My draft is about to handle possible problems when huge amount of domain
names when Internet is in Ipv6 stage. Because of unlimited amount of Ipv6
addresses, unlimited amount of hosts ( servers, PC, even mobile phones, etc )
will have static Ip addresses in the Internet. So, these
Lican Huang (huang_lican) writes:
One problem is how to implement the DNS with huge amount
domain names.
Define huge -- it's already pretty huge today.
I don't think today's DNS implementation can handle
successively with huge amount domain names in the future.
On 3 Dec 2007, at 20:44, Mohsen Souissi wrote:
I have read the I-D as well and I second Joe's point of view and
his arguments [...]
+1
On 4 Dec 2007, at 05:16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Full IPv4 utilization and increasing use of IPv6 is completely
orthonginal to DNS label
If SEARCH outside DNS were full power, then DNS would disappear soon. And
all DNS registrar companies would broken out.
What is the difference between www.microsoft.com and www.jksdfjsdfdfsdf.com
if they represent for the same address of http page? We can browser the
micorsoft's web
On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 02:10:52AM +, Lican Huang wrote:
If SEARCH outside DNS were full power, then DNS would disappear soon. And
all DNS registrar companies would broken out.
perhaps you are right. at this point we don't have enough data.
What is the difference between
Hello,
I have read the documents, draft-licanhuang-dnsop-urnresolution-00,
and draft-licanhuang-dnsop-distributeddns-02.
In the DNSOP meeting today, participants were asked to comment on
the first of those documents. Hence this email.
I have a number of questions about your documents.
To
On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 04:27:06AM +, Lican Huang wrote:
When Ipv4 addresses will be Exhausted in the near future and the next
generation Intenert( Ipv6) will take over, DNS names will also be exhausted
soon with the increase of hosts and users. Lenny Foner has pointed
other
