On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 10:50:51AM +0800,
Kim Davies wrote
a message of 32 lines which said:
> Allowing DNAME records in the root zone is adding a new concept into
> root zone management that hasn't been catered to before. Just one of
> the many things that would need to be looked at is how to
On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 10:50:51AM +0800,
Kim Davies wrote
a message of 32 lines which said:
> Just one of the many things that would need to be looked at is how
> to transmit DNAME provisioning requests via EPP. I don't know if
> there is even an EPP mapping for this.
Interesting remark. I i
On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 08:53:06AM -0500,
Matt Larson wrote
a message of 32 lines which said:
> I'll note that from a technical/mechanical perspective, ICANN's and
> Verisign's root zone management systems already know how to deal
> with delegations. A DNAME in the root would require an unknow
> On Nov 10, 2017, at 7:12 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
>
> draft-wkumari-dnsop-internal-00 says "This document requests that the
> .internal TLD be assigned to the IANA (similar to the way that
> .example is) and a DNSSEC insecure delegation (that is, a delegation
> with no DS records) be ins
draft-wkumari-dnsop-internal-00 says "This document requests that the
.internal TLD be assigned to the IANA (similar to the way that
.example is) and a DNSSEC insecure delegation (that is, a delegation
with no DS records) be inserted into the root-zone, delegated to
blackhole-[12].iana.org."
This
