Re: [DNSOP] reverse-mapping issue 18: RFC 1912

2007-06-26 Thread Andrew Sullivan
On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 02:44:41PM +1000, Mark Andrews wrote: [RFC1912] suggests that it is an operational or configuration error not to have matching PTR and A records. Every address should have a PTR which gives the cannonical name of the host which in

[DNSOP] reverse-mapping issue 18: RFC 1912

2007-06-25 Thread Andrew Sullivan
Issue 18: The draft should refer to RFC 1912 Discussion: RFC 1912 suggests that every A record should have a corresponding PTR. Proposed resolution: add the following text to section 2, as a new paragraph, after its use is codified in [RFC3596].: [RFC1912] suggests that it is an

Re: [DNSOP] reverse-mapping issue 18: RFC 1912

2007-06-25 Thread Mark Andrews
Issue 18: The draft should refer to RFC 1912 Discussion: RFC 1912 suggests that every A record should have a corresponding PTR. Proposed resolution: add the following text to section 2, as a new paragraph, after its use is codified in [RFC3596].: [RFC1912] suggests that