On Jul 8, 2010, at 7:53 PM, bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 11:39:33AM +0200, Olaf Kolkman wrote:
>>
>> I observe though that 4641 is mainly written from the perspective of a
>> 'zone-owner' and that I am not quite sure where to give specific advice to
>> adminis
On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 11:39:33AM +0200, Olaf Kolkman wrote:
>
> I observe though that 4641 is mainly written from the perspective of a
> 'zone-owner' and that I am not quite sure where to give specific advice to
> administrators of recursive nameservers.
>
> So before text is drafted there is
On Jun 16, 2010, at 5:25 PM, John Dickinson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry for the very late reply to this issue.
>
> http://www.nlnetlabs.nl/svn/rfc4641bis/trunk/open-issues/trust_anchor_configuration
>
> Paul asked for proper use of 5011 to be added to 4641bis. I agree, In fact
> could we go furth
