Re: moveable or movable?

rrent preferred spelling. Best regards, Debra  ---Original Message---  From: Matthias Seidel  To: doc@openoffice.apache.org  Subject: moveable or movable?  Sent: Jan 04 '24 10:25  Hi All,  and a Happy New Year!  At the moment I am working on improv

Re: moveable or movable?

bster cites 'movable' as the preferred spelling. On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 12:43 PM wrote: From what I can see online, both are correct. However, "movable" seems to be the current preferred spelling. Best regards, Debra  ---Original Message---  From:

moveable or movable?

Hi All, and a Happy New Year! At the moment I am working on improving our Online Help and I have a short question: We use the term "moveable" as well as "movable". The same applies to "removeable" / "removable". We have a mixture of that in our code. I would like to unify on a single

Re: No spell check Open Office text document - Keine Rechtschreibprüfung Open Office Textdokument

Hi, This is a mailing list for OpenOffice DOCUMENTATION. And I already answered you on users-de... ;-) Regards,    Matthias Am 23.05.23 um 14:22 schrieb FRED: > Hello, > no spell check Open Office text document. > It turns out that the spell checker just doesn't check anymore, there is no

Re: Fw: Self-introduction and Area of Interest

Hi Keith, Am 10.03.23 um 14:53 schrieb Keith N. McKenna: > Matthias Seidel wrote: >> Hi Keith, >> >> Did he get a reaction from us? >> >> Regards, >> >>     Matthias >> >> Am 27.02.23 um 16:28 schrieb Keith N. McKenna: >>> Below

Re: Fw: Self-introduction and Area of Interest

Hi Keith, Did he get a reaction from us? Regards,    Matthias Am 27.02.23 um 16:28 schrieb Keith N. McKenna: > Below is an introduction from a new volunteer to the documentation team > originally sent to volunteer@. > > - Original Message - > From: K C > To:

Re: [GitHub] [openoffice-docs] Pilot-Pirx commented on issue #57: Publish AOO41GS PDF to mwiki

Hi Keith, Looks good to me! Regards,    Matthias Am 11.06.22 um 21:25 schrieb Keith N. McKenna: > Hi Matthias > Matthias Seidel wrote: >> Hi Keith, >> >> Am 11.06.22 um 19:18 schrieb Keith N. McKenna: >>> Matthias Seidel wrote: >>>> Sorry, that shou

Re: [GitHub] [openoffice-docs] Pilot-Pirx commented on issue #57: Publish AOO41GS PDF to mwiki

Hi Keith, Am 11.06.22 um 19:18 schrieb Keith N. McKenna: > Matthias Seidel wrote: >> Sorry, that should have been "Chapter 1 and 6" >> >> I do see Chapter 2 twice. >> >> Am 11.06.22 um 17:24 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >>> >>> Hi Keith, &

Re: [GitHub] [openoffice-docs] Pilot-Pirx commented on issue #57: Publish AOO41GS PDF to mwiki

Sorry, that should have been "Chapter 1 and 6" I do see Chapter 2 twice. Am 11.06.22 um 17:24 schrieb Matthias Seidel: > > Hi Keith, > > Am 11.06.22 um 17:19 schrieb Keith N. McKenna: >> Hi Matthias, >> Matthias Seidel wrote: >> >>>> Hi

Re: [GitHub] [openoffice-docs] Pilot-Pirx commented on issue #57: Publish AOO41GS PDF to mwiki

Hi Keith, Am 11.06.22 um 17:19 schrieb Keith N. McKenna: > Hi Matthias, > Matthias Seidel wrote: > >>> Hi Matthias, >>> >>> Yes Chapter six was missing. All the corrections were made and PDF has >>> been uploaded to mwiki. >> >> I sti

Re: [GitHub] [openoffice-docs] Pilot-Pirx commented on issue #57: Publish AOO41GS PDF to mwiki

Hi Keith, Am 11.06.22 um 01:21 schrieb Keith N. McKenna: > Matthias Seidel wrote: >> Hi Keith, >> >> Am 10.06.22 um 14:50 schrieb Keith N. McKenna: >>> GitBox wrote: >>>> >>>> Pilot-Pirx commented on issue #57: >>>> URL: >

Re: [GitHub] [openoffice-docs] Pilot-Pirx commented on issue #57: Publish AOO41GS PDF to mwiki

Hi Keith, Am 10.06.22 um 14:50 schrieb Keith N. McKenna: > GitBox wrote: >> >> Pilot-Pirx commented on issue #57: >> URL: >> https://github.com/apache/openoffice-docs/issues/57#issuecomment-1151680672 >> >>     Hi Keith, >>     Is Chapter 1 missing? I see Chapter 2 twice... >>     And on page 123

Re: Thoughts for moving forward

Hi, Am 08.06.22 um 16:41 schrieb F Campos Costero: > On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 5:22 PM Keith N. McKenna > wrote: > >> Dennis Hamilton wrote: >>> Here's my recommendation. >>> >>> 1. Do not wait for 4.2. Use the available energy and volunteer >> power to advance the Guides for 4.1. >>> 2. Do

Re: Documentation volunteer - introduction

Hi Keith, Am 04.06.21 um 06:01 schrieb Keith N. McKenna: > On 2021-06-02 17:37, Nadeem Patel wrote: >> Hello Francis, >> >> I can certainly help out with this. I would also like to help develop new >> content if that is something you guys need. Feel free to bring Keith into >> this conversation

Re: Hello!

Hi Francis, all, Until the Wiki Publisher gets uploaded to our extension site, it can be found here: https://home.apache.org/~mseidel/wiki-publisher.oxt Please test, I was able to do basic stuff, but in general everything should work now. Regards,    Matthias Am 28.11.20 um 06:00 schrieb F

Wiki Publisher

Hi all, I discovered that the Wiki Publisher we build with AOO 4.1.8 does seem to work with our Wiki! I just play around with it: https://wiki.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=Test-MS Maybe you want to test: https://home.apache.org/~mseidel/wiki-publisher.oxt Regards,    Matthias

Re: Tech writer

Hi Keith, Maybe this is interesting for your Documentation effort? If someone offers support we should not ignore him/her.. Regards,    Matthias Am 11.08.20 um 19:51 schrieb Nicola Kamper: > Hello, > I have enjoyed Apache Open Office, and am grateful for the work that you > do. I am an