I wrote:
> >>|So it looks like if we use a Section-like (instead of Chapter-like)
> >>|content model for Topic, it'll mean that Topics can contain only
> >>|recursive Sections, not numbered ones (Sect1-Sect5), and that
> >>|Topics can't contain Refentrys at all (or Simplesect).
N
At 16:58 17/10/2001 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>There's some logic there but it would certainly be useful to support some
>sort of sort of container(s) within to allow us to seperate out
>the topic content. For example, a topic on "How to start your car" might
>contain a discussion on what
I am using Jade and the DSSSL1.73 style sheets against DocBook4.1.2 XML to
produce .RTF
I have two tables one after the other and they both render as Table 0:
Here is the XML file and the png is a picture of the resultant RTF file.
Table problems
The first table
>>|So it looks like if we use a Section-like (instead of Chapter-like)
>>|content model for Topic, it'll mean that Topics can contain only
>>|recursive Sections, not numbered ones (Sect1-Sect5), and that
>>|Topics can't contain Refentrys at all (or Simplesect).
>>I am strongly opp
Found it. The link is [EMAIL PROTECTED] though.
Phill
> -Original Message-
> From: Karl Eichwalder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, 17 October 2001 5:24
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: DOCBOOK: Re: Page footers and Headers.
>
>
> Norman Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
/ Dave Pawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
| Guessing that 'topics' could be viewed in a similar way to
| the way in which I use qanda stuff, I like the idea
| of allowing it within other structures, as well as on its own.
Yeah, there's a strange sort of symmetry between my website marku
/ "Nancy (Paisner) Harrison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
| I, on the other hand, am concerned with not allowing sections in the
| mix, since that removes a transparent way to reuse data between
| print and online delivery.
If you need "sections" in a topic, use nested topics. Allowing
s
>
>| 3. Content model for the set-of-topics element (Helpproject). Does
it
>| need to include the navigational components (ToC,
LoT, Index)?
>| These seem useful only if authors want to
manually author ToCs,
>| LoTs, and Indexes, instead of leaving it up to
the
>| stylesheets/helpcom
At 10:38 17/10/2001 -0400, Norman Walsh wrote:
>|I think Helpproject is good as the name for a set of topics; some
>|other possibilities: Helpfile, Helpvolume, Helpset. But I guess
>|Helpproject seems best.
>
>So we need a new name for the set-of-projects wrapper.
project-set?
>Re
At 13:56 16/10/2001 -0400, Norman Walsh wrote:
>What's the plan:
>
>The overall plan is to allow people to author "Help Sets" using all of
>the rich technical structure of DocBook without shoe-horning it into
>the classical print book model.
Guessing that 'topics' could be viewed in a similar wa
/ Michael Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
| 1. Online-help peer to Set. Do we actually need one? What will the
|processing expectations be for it? Do any of the existing help
|systems -- HTML Help, Javahelp, or whatever -- provide any way for
|packaging up sets of HTML Help
> 1. Online-help peer to Set. Do we actually need one?
It would be useful for us. We currently package our book set containing
documentation on all of our products, with one version installable into an
online helpviewer in the QNX operating system. Most of our products can work
together, an
Norman Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> / Phillip Shelton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
> | I want to put The company name in the header and the filename and author in
> | the footer.
>
> The filename isn't available to Jade, so I don't think you can easily do
> that.
Yes.
In the beg
Norman Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There's been a fair amount of discussion about how to make DocBook
> more help-friendly. Since we don't seem to be making a lot of progress
> in the absence of a concrete proposal, attached is my first draft of a
> concrete proposal. There, now there's s
On Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 01:57:17PM -0400, Norman Walsh wrote:
> / Phillip Shelton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
> | I want to put The company name in the header and the filename and author in
> | the footer.
>
> The filename isn't available to Jade, so I don't think you can easily do
> th
15 matches
Mail list logo
