Apologies for being so harsh.
And I have nothing against DocBook or its documentation.
I just don't feel that the community would be served well if the 2.0.2
version was hardcopied as is. I tend to buy books as references and I feel
that the 2.0.2tar file of the TDG would give the wrong impress
At 10:49 29/10/2001 +1000, Phillip Shelton wrote:
>It is in need of heavy review and editing. I do not mind pointing out
>errors as
>I find then, (But would like to know where the best place to send this would
>be?) But in its present state it is not worth hardcopy publishing.
Rather harsh?
Muc
