DOCBOOK: Re: Announce: Simplified DocBook V1.0 Candidate Release 1

2002-06-06 Thread Norman Walsh
/ Bob Stayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say: | I can just edit my copy of the catalog file. But don't you already have a catalog file containing these entries? These are, after all, just the standard ISO and DocBook DTD entries. | sdocbook.cat | -- |

Re: DOCBOOK: Re: packagename proposal/RFE

2002-06-06 Thread Elliotte Rusty Harold
At 10:24 AM + 6/5/02, Matt G. wrote: 1. Is packagename the right name for symmetry with classname and interfacename or should this be simply package? Or perhapps oopackage for symmetry with ooclass and oointerface? Personally, I fail to see why 'package' wouldn't work just as well. Unless

RE: DOCBOOK: Re: packagename proposal/RFE

2002-06-06 Thread David Cramer
I'd like to second that point. Compare oointerface v. interface. Consistency seems to require oopackage. David To add another dimension to the discussion, the word package in the field of software can also mean a package of software for distribution, such as an RPM package. Authors who

Re: DOCBOOK: Re: Announce: Simplified DocBook V1.0 Candidate Release 1

2002-06-06 Thread Bob Stayton
On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 08:01:38AM -0400, Norman Walsh wrote: / Bob Stayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say: | I can just edit my copy of the catalog file. But don't you already have a catalog file containing these entries? These are, after all, just the standard ISO and DocBook DTD

DOCBOOK: Re: Announce: Simplified DocBook V1.0 Candidate Release 1

2002-06-06 Thread Mike Brown
sdocbook.dtd has a typo: !ENTITY % xref.char.class footnotref|xref %local.xref.char.class; ^^ (should be footnoteref) It also still says v1.0b2 in the comments. - Mike mike j.

Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: xsltproc segfaults with 1.51.1

2002-06-06 Thread Camille Bégnis
Hi, The following is my version that segfaults: - Using libxml 20420, libxslt 10018 and libexslt 709 xsltproc was compiled against libxml 20421, libxslt 10018 and libexslt 709 libxslt 10018 was compiled against libxml 20421 libexslt 709 was

Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: xsltproc segfaults with 1.51.1

2002-06-06 Thread Daniel Veillard
On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 11:07:31AM +0200, Camille Bégnis wrote: So now, what's the problem(s): - a bug in libxslt ? possibly, one that got fixed in the latest release (it took me one month to make that release, so there is a number of bug fixes in it !). - a bug in the 1.51.1 XSL?

Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: About DB2LaTeX

2002-06-06 Thread Michael Smith
Ramon Casellas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Many of the comments and bug reports I receive about DB2LaTeX concern the escaping of characters as well as internationalization. I'm thinking about how I could improve the package, and using external modules with java and/or C++ is an option.

DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: Treatment of links in print

2002-06-06 Thread Norman Walsh
/ Thomas Colby [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say: | I'm currently using the docbook DSSSL stylesheets 1.72 | with openjade and tex to produce pdf and postscript documents. | | Any suggestions on rendering links on paper would be welcome, | Thanks in advance, It can be done, but you'll probably

DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: HTML meta description tags

2002-06-06 Thread Norman Walsh
[ Follow-ups to docbook-apps, please ] / Aaron Isotton [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say: | Sorry, I don't understand. I just grepped through the docbook | documentation for user. but didn't find anything like that. Could | you give me a pointer please? Use this template in your customization

Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: About DB2LaTeX

2002-06-06 Thread Andrzej Swedrzynski
On Thu, 6 Jun 2002, Michael Smith wrote: Ramon Casellas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [snip] - Should I add extension modules in order to make DB2LaTeX to make it perform better and faster? FWIW, I'd vote for keeping the XSL only approach. I think there's a big value in it -- in enabling

DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: Problem with Next/Prev links when usinghtml/chunk.xml

2002-06-06 Thread Norman Walsh
/ Vincent Hikida [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say: | I'm having a problem in the html created using chunk.xml. | | Basically, the next and prev links are often wrong. An example is that | the next link may be ch03s02.htmlch04.htmlch04s02.html when it should be | ch03s02.html | I've

RE: DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: Problem with Next/Prev links when usinghtml/chunk.xml

2002-06-06 Thread Vincent Hikida
/ Vincent Hikida [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say: | I'm having a problem in the html created using chunk.xml. | | Basically, the next and prev links are often wrong. An example is that | the next link may be ch03s02.htmlch04.htmlch04s02.html when it should be | ch03s02.html | I've