Hello,
I have a question about the interface tag. The latest version of the TDG
that I have seen (V2.0.4+) says:
An Interface identifies some part of a graphical user interface. This
element became obsolete in DocBook V3.0 with the introduction of
GUIButton, GUIIcon, GUILabel, GUIMenu,
I've published version 2.0.5 of DocBook: The Definitive Guide at
http://docbook.org/tdg/
This version is built off the CR3 document type.
Also: updated the reference pages for imageobject, tweaked navigation,
rebuilt the example see-also lists, added refentryinfo to all the
reference pages, and
* Norman Walsh; [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 11 Jun, 2002 wrote:
This version is built off the CR3 document type.
Also: updated the reference pages for imageobject, tweaked navigation,
rebuilt the example see-also lists, added refentryinfo to all the
reference pages, and incorporated a number of other
/ Togan Muftuoglu [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say:
| Shall I add a tracker for the updates of Languages supported or you have
| that already in your agenda.
Trackers for all bugs, please. My memory is overflowing.
| Will you be adding the derivates of Docbook ie Slides, Website. Thanks
I
/ Norman Walsh [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say:
| I've published version 2.0.5 of DocBook: The Definitive Guide at
| http://docbook.org/tdg/
V2.0.5 is broken. Expect 2.0.6, er, soon.
Be seeing you,
norm
--
Hi,
Is it possible to use both chunk.xsl and changebars.xsl? If I import them
both, no matter in what order, the changebars stylesheet won't have any effect.
The only workaround I could find was to import changebars.xsl into
docbook.xsl by adding an xsl:import line, and remove the line which
Raphael Goubet wrote:
Is it possible to use both chunk.xsl and changebars.xsl? If I import them
both, no matter in what order, the changebars stylesheet won't have any effect.
The only workaround I could find was to import changebars.xsl into
docbook.xsl by adding an xsl:import line, and
Hi!
I am the guy, who is working on the PHP Documentations new
CHM format (which uses XSL style sheets instead of the DSSSL
ones used for the other formats).
One of the most annoying problems with the XSL style sheets so
far was the TOC deepness parameter. I cannot get the same TOC
deepness as
Gabor Hojtsy wrote:
I have used:
xsl:param name=toc.section.depth0/xsl:param
And it prodoced a TOC with only the topmost elements, and
I have tested:
xsl:param name=toc.section.depth1/xsl:param
and it produced a TOC as deep as it can bee... ;(((
This simply works for me. Do you
I have used:
xsl:param name=toc.section.depth0/xsl:param
And it prodoced a TOC with only the topmost elements, and
I have tested:
xsl:param name=toc.section.depth1/xsl:param
and it produced a TOC as deep as it can bee... ;(((
This simply works for me. Do you have recent
hello all
i'm using the xsl stylesheets to create a pdf file using fop
everything in the latest version
i have a problem with my glossary
due to the fact, that e have relatively long terms, the term is written
over the definition in pdf, where the glossary is in table format.
questions:
1. is
On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 05:21:20PM +0200, zope-mailinglist wrote:
hello all
i'm using the xsl stylesheets to create a pdf file using fop
everything in the latest version
i have a problem with my glossary
due to the fact, that e have relatively long terms, the term is written
over the
12 matches
Mail list logo
