DOCBOOK: Problem with XInclude

2002-11-19 Thread Sebastian Bergmann
Hello there. I just tried to use XInclude in my DocBook/XML marked up book to include listings from external files into sections, but all I get out of is in the output and No template matches xi:include in programlisting. as a warning from Saxon 6.5.2. -- Seb

DOCBOOK: Re: [docbook-tc] DocBook Technical Committee Meeting Minutes:19 Nov 2002

2002-11-19 Thread Paul Grosso
At 14:40 2002 11 19 -0500, Norman Walsh wrote: >| 6. Instance-based cross-reference text > >This is on the agenda for Paul to consider use cases. Unfortunately, >Paul isn't here this week. > >ACTION: Bob to discuss with Paul for next month. Plan to close next month. Oops, what was/am I supposed t

Re: DOCBOOK: DocBook Technical Committee Meeting Minutes: 19 Nov 2002

2002-11-19 Thread Bob Stayton
One correction: > | 616216 recursive Subset tag > > We will add set to itself, allowing (set|book)+ where (book)+ is > currently allowed in set. Any objection? None. > > Accepted. I thought we were voting on allowing (set+|book+) in place of (book)+. I don't think you want to mix sets and

DOCBOOK: DocBook Technical Committee Meeting Minutes: 19 Nov 2002

2002-11-19 Thread Norman Walsh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 DocBook Technical Committee Meeting Minutes: 19 Nov 2002 === The DocBook Technical Committee met on Tuesday, 19 November 2002 at 01:00p EST (10:00a PST, 18:00GMT, 19:00CET, 03:00JST+) for 90 minutes.

Re: DOCBOOK: Re: New element for Step alternatives?

2002-11-19 Thread Michael Smith
Norman Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > > / Michael Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: | Norman Walsh > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: |> Personally, I'm inclined to the middle > course. To wit: |> |> * Add alternatives to procedure as I su

DOCBOOK: Re: New element for Step alternatives?

2002-11-19 Thread Norman Walsh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 / Michael Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: | Norman Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: |> Personally, I'm inclined to the middle course. To wit: |> |> * Add alternatives to procedure as I suggested previously: |> |> Replace 'substeps' i

Re: DOCBOOK: Re: New element for Step alternatives?

2002-11-19 Thread John R. Daily
I haven't followed the discussion closely, but to throw out another scenario where the current procedure semantics seem to fall short (assuming I'm not overlooking something): I recently turned a series of functional test cases into DocBook. Each case was 1 or more actions, followed by 1 or more e

DOCBOOK: Re: DocBook Technical Committee Meeting Minutes: 15 Oct 2002

2002-11-19 Thread Norman Walsh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 | | 4. Review of open action items {5 min} [...] | | b. Norm to construct an example of RFE #558443 using existing metadata Bob already did this[1]. | | f. Norm to post combined table markup for CALS+HTML Done[2]. And thanks to Paul Grosso f

Re: AW: DOCBOOK: docbook suitable for book - creation ?

2002-11-19 Thread Bob Stayton
On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 08:02:33PM +0100, KMcLauchlan wrote: > [stuff deleted] > > Every time I turn around, somebody is making > different claims for DocBook (and whether the > pure-and-godly way to do it is DSSSL or XSL, > or... whatever the other choices are). One > minute I'me hearing that