Ok, I've looked at:
* http://docbook.sourceforge.net/
* http://www.nwalsh.com/
And also at:
* http://ftp.redhat.com/redhat-7.1/[lots of garbage]/updates
And I can't find the docbook utilities package (which apparently
contains the "jw" package).
Annoyingly enough, I found the docbook utiliti
Tim!
> I will add some RPM runes to prevent these two getting out of sync.
Aren't runes those things that were used by the Norse people as stones
of power?
DSL
--
If we could extract all the evil from each of us,
Think of the world that we could create!
A world without anger, or violence or
I have a RedHat 7.1 based system using:
* dsssl-stylesheets-1.64
Now, the following:
David Lloyd
My Address
Does not render at all using the print modules. It renders when I use
the html modules.
Also, when I attempted to use v1.73 stylesheets I got complaints about
the number of
Hmmm...
> BTW: is there a tool to convert xml to latex ?
(make simple-page-sequence
(literal 'latex)
)
LMAO
--
Pussy's good for six at the most
(Mrs. Lovett, Sweeney Todd)
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist us
Hi!
> can look messy when editing. If I break up the large DocBook file, is
> there
> a way I can make sure the pages are all linked as they were before, or do
> I need to modify the stylesheets?
To do what you want, you'll need something similar to this:
]>
A Title
&chapter1;
&chapter2;
Eric!
> There isn't a direct method ?
No and it's painful.
Note this output:
[root]# openjade -f
openjade:E: missing argument for option "f"
openjade:I: usage is "openjade [-vCegG2s] [-b encoding] [-f error_file]
[-c catalog_sysid] [-D dir] [-a link_type] [-A arch] [-E max_errors] [-i
entity]
Is it possible to parse well-formed XML with DSSSL?
DSL
--
To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word
"unsubscribe" in the body to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Here's a few snippets:
...
...
Xref Example
is a link to the section with that id.
...
You can download a copy of "Docbook: The Definitive Guide" from
http://www.docbook.org/ for free. It's worth it - when I work with
DocBook I have a copy of it in a browser for reference (although I ha
Confounded RPM :-(
It's ok now. I'd rpm -e --nodeps dsssl-1.59 only to find that something
broke, so I rpm'ed it back and stupid RPM clobbered my catalog
definitions.
DSL
Confound!
I've downloaded 1.64 and changed /etc/sgml to refer to
dsssl-stylesheets-1.64 but I'm still getting funny numbers in the pdf
backend. It's fixed on the HTML backend though...
DSL
Tim!
> Please get the docbook-style-dsssl-1.64-2 package, which was recently
> released as an erratum package. It fixes this bug.
>
> Thanks,
> Tim.
> */
Thanks. That I'll do. It doesn't appear to be on the RedHat update site
yet though...
DSL
I'm using:
>From default RedHat 7.1 distribution with no changes to dbparam.dsl or
any other settings. When I create my book using db2html which seems to
be wrapper for something called "jw", I get toc's with:
Linux (comment 1)
1 (comment 2)
(comment 1)
This is normal and hyperlinked
(co
Hmmm...
> Since when are they not searchable? http://www.LinuxDoc.org/search.html
> has options for what to search, and one of those is the mailing list
> archives.
So I didn't see the searchable part? I could draw conclusions about how
this reflects on the LDP, but...
> This is, at least in
Norm (1)!
> Can anyone site examples where international date format issues arise
> in technical documentation?
I can only, sardonically say they occur where dates in text-only format
occur. Because the LDP obviously accepts documents from many, many
people they don't all conform to the ISO dat
Bart!
> But this isn't everyday life. Presumably you're using SGML or XML markup
> to specify exactly what you mean with every piece of text you write. Why
> then deliberately use a multitude of local notations for something that
> has a standard, unambiguous notation defined for it already?
Th
Do they exist anywhere? I'm doing some documentation and the only
"official" (but broken) RPMs from RedHat are for V3.1...
DL
--
The hate stands ready...
Send forth your terror into HELL!
Karl!
> That's why we all are asked to use ISO notation these days; if you
> really think a DATE element is needed give it a PCDATA content and use:
>
> 2001-01-08
I refuse to use ISO in everyday life. It's totally unnatural and
everyone would think I was weird. They already do anyway.
Hi There!
> Wouldn't that be a role of date?
Role as in an attribute "role"? Possibly
> There are several problems with calendars in general (sorry, prior life
> as a data analyst dealing with time and dates).
That is all very interesting but it doesn't solve the original problem.
The o
Damn! Confound!
> Not a good guess:
I spend too much time in blasted Unix C land where array indices being
at 0 and not 1 :-(
> 1) There is and never was a year 0 - The Common Era (C.E. a.k.a. A.D.)
>begins in year 1.
Agreed. Wholeheartedly.
> 2) Whilst it is unlikely that the LDP would
REQUEST FOR ENHANCEMENT
---
Type:
Additional Sub Element
Reason:
Elimination of International Date Format Issues
Details:
Add the following elements to :
numerical, from 1 to 31 inclusive
numerical, from 0 to infinity (I guess)
numerical, from 1 to 12 inclusive
20 matches
Mail list logo
