Matthew Braun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>
> Darn--I hate guessing wrong like that. Still, they shouldn't use
> that DTD for this HTML. I mean, it'll _never_ validate. :-)
You may define it to whichever DTD you would like by placing the
following in your dsssl driver file:
(define %html
>Well, the DOCTYPE of the generated HTML. :-)
>
>
Darn--I hate guessing wrong like that. Still, they shouldn't use
that DTD for this HTML. I mean, it'll _never_ validate. :-)
>I see now that that comes from the DSL file I'm using
>(/usr/share/sgml/docbook/utils-0.6/docbook-utils.dsl, which is
On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 02:22:32PM -0500, Matthew Braun wrote:
> > Sorry, this document does not validate as HTML 4.01 Strict.
>
> Uh...was there any claim that the stylesheets produced HTML which validated
> as _strict_ HTML 4.01?
Well, the DOCTYPE of the generated HTML. :-)
I see now that
Tim Waugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>This file (test.sgml):
>when processed with 'db2html test.sgml' on a Red Hat Linux 7.1 system
>produces t1.html, which has the appended errors when validated using
>validator.w3.org.
>Document Checked
>o File: t1.html
>o Character encoding: unknown
>o Docu
This file (test.sgml):
-->
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet.
<--
when processed with 'db2html test.sgml' on a Red Hat Linux 7.1 system
produces t1.html, which has the appended errors when validated using
validator.w3.org.
openjade-1.3-13
docbook-style-dsssl-1.64-2
doc
