Norman Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> inlinemediaobject ::=
> (objectinfo?,
> textobject+|
> ((videoobject|audioobject|imageobject),
> (videoobject|audioobject|imageobject|textobject)*))
This looks unclean, sorry. Why can't users use CDATA marked sections?
Who cannot use CDATA (or RCDA
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At 08:38 13-11-2001, Peter Ring wrote:
>http://www.oreilly.com/people/staff/crism/transclu.html (SGML/XML '97)
Just a note: as I left O'Reilly over two years ago, I have no idea how long
any content on that web will be available. Please reference
On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 05:38:12PM +0100, Peter Ring wrote:
> Wrt. XInclude and SGML, something similar has already been invented
> in HyTime, http://www.ornl.gov/sgml/wg8/docs/n1920/html/n1920.html.
> A lot of what is being accomplished with XML now was already present
> in HyTime five years a
IMHO, XInclude is useful for collecting
nodes or nodesets from a number of documents. It can be used
right away; the biggest problem is actually to customize the
DocBook DTD to allow an 'include' element in appropriate places.
The XInclude namespace is a non-problem, at least until someone
e
At 8:58 AM -0500 11/13/01, Norman Walsh wrote:
>But, using XInclude would raise at least the following issues:
>
>1. Can we limit it to parse=text. I don't think so. If we refer
>normatively to XInclude, we have to accept XInclude semantics.
>
Fine with me. :-)
>2. Where would we allow xin
On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 08:58:55AM -0500, Norman Walsh wrote:
> 1. Can we limit it to parse=text. I don't think so. If we refer
>normatively to XInclude, we have to accept XInclude semantics.
Can't we somewhat put the parse attribute to #FIXED ? That would just
subset the standard - would be
/ Elliotte Rusty Harold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
| At 12:54 PM -0500 11/12/01, Norman Walsh wrote:
|
| >In fact, the only reasons I want to pursue this at all, instead of
| >simply saying "use XInclude" are that (1) XInclude is not a REC,
|
| Which do you think is more likely to be
At 12:54 PM -0500 11/12/01, Norman Walsh wrote:
>In fact, the only reasons I want to pursue this at all, instead of
>simply saying "use XInclude" are that (1) XInclude is not a REC,
Which do you think is more likely to be done first? XInclude or
Docbook 5? My current understanding is that XInc
/ Phillip Shelton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
| By the way, your Concrete proposal only mentions inlinemediaobject. Is it
| possible to add this to the mediaobject as well?
Yes. But to avoid extra whitespace in (for example),
it's better to use
> -Original Message-
[snip]
> > I had imagined that the 'fileref' or 'entityref' attributes would be
> > sufficient. In any context,
> >
> >
> >
> > would insert the contents of somefile.txt as unparsed text (to
> > whatever extent that textobject is used). Likewise, in any context:
>
> From: Norman Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> / Bob Stayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
> | > From: Norman Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> [...]
> | > If we do that, I suggest that we change the content model of
> | > inlinemediaobject to:
> | >
> | > inlinemediaobject ::=
> | > (objectinfo
/ Bob Stayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
| > From: Norman Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[...]
| > If we do that, I suggest that we change the content model of
| > inlinemediaobject to:
| >
| > inlinemediaobject ::=
| > (objectinfo?,
| > textobject+|
| > ((videoobject|audioobject|imageobj
12 matches
Mail list logo
