>From: "David Cramer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "Bob Stayton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Matt G." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>CC: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: RE: DOCBOOK: Re: packagename proposal/RFE
>Dat
I'd like to second that point. Compare v. .
Consistency seems to require .
David
> To add another dimension to the discussion, the word
> "package" in the field of software can also mean
> a package of software for distribution, such as an
> RPM package. Authors who deal with packaging softwar
At 10:24 AM + 6/5/02, Matt G. wrote:
>>1. Is "packagename" the right name for symmetry with classname and
>>interfacename or should this be simply "package"? Or perhapps
>>"oopackage" for symmetry with ooclass and oointerface?
>
>Personally, I fail to see why 'package' wouldn't work just as
>To add another dimension to the discussion, the word
>"package" in the field of software can also mean
>a package of software for distribution, such as an
>RPM package. Authors who deal with packaging software
>but not APIs will perhaps misuse a element.
Do you really think the semantics shoul
On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 01:55:51PM +, Matt G. wrote:
> >From: Jirka Kosek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: "Matt G." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: Re: DOCBOOK: Re: packagename proposal/RFE
> >Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2002 13:1
>From: Jirka Kosek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "Matt G." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: DOCBOOK: Re: packagename proposal/RFE
>Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2002 13:11:43 +0200
>
>"Matt G." wrote:
>
> > >e.g. C++ or
"Matt G." wrote:
> >e.g. C++ or C# namespaces or Perl modules?
>
> Arg! Please don't confuse namespaces and packages!! Even though Java may
In .Net (C#, VB.NET, ...) terminology namespace is equivalent to package
in Java sense. It is set of related classes. It's quite confusing name,
but it's
