DOCBOOK-APPS: DocBook with AbiWord?

If you save an AbiWord document as DocBook, it creates a DocBook XML 4.1.2 file. You can then process your file as you would normally. I just downloaded AbiWord 0.9.6, and would like to give this a try for writing my articles. But it's not apparent how I could get full use of docbook from AbiWo

DOCBOOK-APPS: ANN: RefDB 0.8.2 - reference and bibliography tool

Hi all, version 0.8.2 of RefDB, a reference database and bibliography tool for markup languages, is now available at: http://refdb.sourceforge.net Description === RefDB helps you to keep track of the publications you read and allows you to automatically create bibliographies in your SG

DOCBOOK-APPS: "Abbreviated" DocBook

I am strongly considering using DocBook for documentation of Aspell however there is one major problem. DocBook is too dam verbose, providing an entry for just about everything under the sun. Although you may disagree with me, it is so verbose that just reading a DocBook source document becomes

DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: Outfoxing fo-patch-for-fop.xsl

/ Matthew Braun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: | To work around this, I added the "Fop extensions" namespace to the top of | fo-patch-for-fop.xsl like so: | | | http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform"; | xmlns:fo="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Format"; | xmlns:fox=

DOCBOOK-APPS: Outfoxing fo-patch-for-fop.xsl

Now that we have fo-patch-for-fop.xsl (Thanks Norm!) I tried running a recent document through a customized stylesheet. Transforming the document with the 1.48 stylesheets worked fine (of course) but when I ran it through fo-patch-for-fop.xsl, I got: xsltproc --catalogs -o /tmp/147852.fo \

RE: DOCBOOK-APPS: Customizing XSL-FO for IEEE style articles

You want to use Norm Walsh's xsl stylesheets to transform docbook source, right? The answers some of those questions can be found at: http://www.dpawson.co.uk/docbook/styling/styling.html and http://docbook.org/tdg/en/html/docbook.html, especially htt

Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: Conceptual model for processing DocBook SGML andXML

On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 06:04:21PM +, Dave Pawson wrote: > At 03:40 09/01/2002 -0500, Daniel Veillard wrote: > > > > Hum, one of the thing which strikes me is that there is no > >direct > > DocBook XML -> TeX > >transformations. Basically they require going through FO where the > >sema

DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: Conceptual model for processing DocBook SGML and XML

/ Dave Pawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: | At 17:02 08/01/2002 -0500, Norman Walsh wrote: |>/ Jirka Kosek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: |>|> the processing model and turned the crank. |>| |>| What about posting also source RDF for us who are curious? |> |>When it's a little less

Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: Conceptual model for processing DocBook SGML andXML

At 03:40 09/01/2002 -0500, Daniel Veillard wrote: > Hum, one of the thing which strikes me is that there is no >direct > DocBook XML -> TeX >transformations. Basically they require going through FO where the >semantic is lost and only content/formatting is left, where then TeX >is generate

Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: Conceptual model for processing DocBook SGML andXML

At 17:02 08/01/2002 -0500, Norman Walsh wrote: >/ Jirka Kosek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: >|> the processing model and turned the crank. >| >| What about posting also source RDF for us who are curious? > >When it's a little less amateurish :-), I'll publish the whole app. http://www.zvo

DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: Conceptual model for processing DocBook SGML and XML

/ Nik Clayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: | Interesting. I've just started looking at redoing this in a more | portable format, but the tools I've looked at so far (basically, Visio | and Kivio) don't support SVG output, which I'd assumed would be the | preferred format. Any other sugg

Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: Conceptual model for processing DocBook SGML andXML

--FEz7ebHBGB6b2e8X Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 04:41:15PM -0500, Norman Walsh wrote: > / Nik Clayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: > | Folks, > | > | I've knocked up > | > |

Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: looking to develop training materials using docbook

On Tue, 8 Jan 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Rday, > Errr, it's not a DocBook solution, but StarOffice can > take those files and use them just as is, or even make > them run faster and cleaner, it is available for M$ OSs, > as well as Linux and Solaris. It is free from Sun Microsystems, > www.

Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: Using fo-patch-for-fop.xsl and question aboutXHTML namespaces

On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 06:22:38AM -0800, Carlos Araya wrote: > On 01/09/02 5:16, "Norman Walsh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > / Carlos Araya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: > > | I have two more questions after which I believe I can go back to writing. > > | > > | Is there a way to elim

Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: Using fo-patch-for-fop.xsl and question aboutXHTML namespaces

On 01/09/02 5:16, "Norman Walsh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > / Carlos Araya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: > | I have two more questions after which I believe I can go back to writing. > | > | Is there a way to eliminate the xmlns: declarations from every single > | element on an XHTML fi

RE: DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: Using fo-patch-for-fop.xsl and question abo utXHTML namespaces

> How on earth do I use the fo-patch-for-fop.xsl file? I've searched the > sourceforge site and have found no information about the patch at all In case an example helps, here's the test transformation I ran yesterday. This particular chain uses Saxon, Norm's entity resolver, and Apache's FOP: 1

DOCBOOK-APPS: Translation help

In the interest of producing somewhat better test documentation, I'd like to have some reasonable text available in all of the languages that the stylesheets support. In particular, I'd like to have the two paragraphs below translated into: Afrikaans, Catalan, Czech, Danish, German, Greek, Spanis

DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: Problems with glossterms,DocBook FO-Stylesheets (1.48) and FOP

/ Sven Kitschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: | I assume this is a problem of the Stylesheets, but neither | PassiveTEX nor XEP report problems. It is. They should. It's fixed in CVS. Be seeing you, norm -

Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: DocBook to TeX

Michel Goossens wrote: > do some more work on his project). The main problem is that it relies in > part on Norm's XSL stylesheets for DocBook, so unless one follows what > Norm is doing they get (and in fact are) out of synch and no longer > function correctly. m I don't think so. In it latests

DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: Using fo-patch-for-fop.xsl and question about XHTMLnamespaces

/ Carlos Araya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: | I have two more questions after which I believe I can go back to writing. | | Is there a way to eliminate the xmlns: declarations from every single | element on an XHTML file? They are hardcoded into each page and I don't know What processor

DOCBOOK-APPS: DocBook to TeX

Daniel Veillard wrote: > Hum, one of the thing which strikes me is that there is no > direct DocBook XML -> TeX > transformations. Basically they require going through FO where the > semantic is lost and only content/formatting is left, where then TeX > is generated. > Granted, LaTeX is not Te

DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: How things point to things?

/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say: | If I use the declaration: | http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/xml/4.0/docbookx.dtd By declaration, I assume you mean, http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/xml/4.0/docbookx.dtd";> at the start of your document. In which case, I strongly recommend http://www.

DOCBOOK-APPS: Problems with glossterms,DocBook FO-Stylesheets (1.48) and FOP

Hi all, I have Problems to generate PDF with FOP 0.20.2 and the new XSL-Stylesheets (1.48). (I don't dealing with the master-reference stuff here!) FOP dies complaining about twice defined IDs: [ERROR]: The id "lock" already exists in this document I identified the glossary-related stylesheets a

DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: Bug: use id as filename,and root.filename appear mutually exclusive

- Original Message - From: "Norman Walsh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > / Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: > | IMO the root.filename parameter should override the use.id.as.filename > | parameter, or if both behaviours are needed, there should be a parameter > | to control th

Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: Using fo-patch-for-fop.xsl and question about XHTMLnamespaces

Carlos Araya wrote: > How on earth do I use the fo-patch-for-fop.xsl file? I've searched the > sourceforge site and have found no information about the patch at all > Apply it in a second run to the generated fo file, eg.: saxon -o out.fo in.xml xsl/fo/docbook.xsl saxon -o out-for-fop.fo out.fo

DOCBOOK-APPS: Direct DocBook XML to LaTeX? (was ... Re: Conceptualmodel for pr ocessing DocBook SGML and XML)

Hi DocBookers, Daniel Veillard wrote... > [...] one of the thing which strikes me is that there is no direct > DocBook XML -> TeX transformations. Basically they require > going through FO where the semantic is lost and only content/formatting > [...] Granted, LaTeX is not TeX, but isn't there

Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: Conceptual model for processing DocBook SGMLandXML

Daniel Veillard wrote: ... > Granted, LaTeX is not TeX, but isn't there more semantic to TeX than > just content/formatting . Wouldn't a direct DocBook XML -> TeX transformation > makes senses (I'm not asking if someone wants to do it or if it's simple ;-) ... See "DocBook to LaTeX XSL styleshe

Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: Conceptual model for processing DocBook SGML andXML

--tZCmRiovzb4sxAVa Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 03:40:14AM -0500, Daniel Veillard wrote: > Hum, one of the thing which strikes me is that there is no > direct=20 > DocBook XML ->

Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: Conceptual model for processing DocBook SGML andXML

On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 04:41:15PM -0500, Norman Walsh wrote: > / Nik Clayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: > | Folks, > | > | I've knocked up > | > | http://people.freebsd.org/~nik/sgmlxml.gif > > And I've knocked up the attached. I figured it was time to learn some > RDF and Dan Con